CRC Archives - Compliance Risk Concepts

10-Year Anniversary Letter From Mitch Avnet

CRC — Sat, 03 Feb 2024 15:53:23 +0000

To All our Amazing Clients:

No matter how you measure it, we want to express our profound gratitude as we mark our 10th Anniversary. Without your support throughout this transformative journey, Compliance Risk Concepts would not be what it is today.

CRC began as a one-person operation with a unique approach to compliance professional services: understanding each client’s needs and model, and then tailoring our solutions to suit them. We grew by underpinning our clients’ commercial success with a balanced, measured understanding of regulation and compliance. Today, we stand as a team of 50+ of the industry’s best and brightest, humbled by our growth and collective accomplishments. Through it all, we’ve strived to be a true partner – functioning as a seamless extension of your team.

Our proudest milestones include not only thriving in a remote environment during the pandemic, but also balancing our serious commitment to compliance with teamwork and fun. This balance is key to our culture and vision, making it possible for our team to achieve results we only dreamed were possible.

As we look into the future of a constantly evolving regulatory landscape, areas like digital currencies, alternative investments, best interest standards, cyber-threats, and off-channel communications all pose new and significant challenges. Rest assured, we will continue providing the insightful guidance and support you need to confidently navigate these emerging trends – and stay ahead of the pack.

To mark our first 10 years, we’ve refreshed our logo and educational materials. On behalf of everyone at CRC, thank you for entrusting us with your compliance programs and regulatory wellness. It’s an honor to partner with you, and we look forward to contributing to your success story in the decade to come.

With sincere thanks,

Mitch Avnet
Founder and Managing Partner

The post 10-Year Anniversary Letter From Mitch Avnet appeared first on Compliance Risk Concepts.

Compliance Risk Concepts Receives Strategic Investment from MidOcean Partners

CRC — Tue, 30 Jan 2024 14:17:57 +0000

NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Compliance Risk Concepts (“CRC”), through its parent company, Re-Sourcing Group, has received a significant investment from MidOcean Partners to advance its position as a valued compliance partner to the financial services industry. This investment will support the continued growth of CRC’s unique brand of business-focused compliance and risk management advisory services.

The compliance and risk management industry has evolved in recent years, amid new regulations, rule modifications and heightened government oversight. These changes come amid consolidation in the outsourced compliance space, resulting in fewer options for clients seeking expertise coupled with exceptional service.

CRC has thrived as a provider of senior-level compliance advisory services for financial organizations. The firm delivers expert-driven advice and strategy for its clients, which include broker-dealers, investment advisers, fintech and digital asset firms, banks and credit unions, in helping them navigate the ever-changing regulatory landscape. Recognizing CRC’s strong position in the market, MidOcean Partners, a premier middle-market private equity firm focused on the business services and consumer sectors, anticipates CRC’s continued success in delivering compliance solutions to a diverse clientele.

“Market demand for outsourced solutions in the compliance advisory arena has grown significantly in recent years,” said Mitch Avnet, founder of CRC. “At the same time, consolidation has left clients with fewer premier options. CRC has over 50 senior compliance professionals on our team, and we can deliver the guidance, insight and day-to-day execution support that firms in the financial services market are seeking. We are known for our ‘in-the-seat’ approach to compliance and risk management support, and we plan to leverage this growth investment to extend our reach within the industry.”

The confluence of talent shortages and increasingly complex requirements for managing businesses on the legal and compliance front has led to a continued surge in demand for outsourced solutions. For example, in the investment adviser sector, an estimated 59%¹ of firms outsourced some or all of their compliance and legal work. Avnet and his partners at MidOcean see this as an opportunity for further growth.

Avnet added: “We are business people that know compliance and we are fully invested in helping our clients achieve great commercial outcomes while remaining regulatorily compliant. Our partnership with MidOcean is integral to our overall business thesis and we look forward to leveraging the impact of MidOcean’s investment to extend our reach within the industry.”

“There is incredible upside for a firm of CRC’s caliber to fill the void that firms have in meeting their compliance needs and having the support they want to help them make sound business decisions. We feel that the consolidation happening that has absorbed some boutique players has spurred the opportunity for CRC even more, and we’re eager to see how our investment can be a catalyst for Mitch and his team,” shared Elias Dokas, Managing Director at MidOcean Partners.

¹ Source: https://www.assetmark.com/blog/advisors-front-middle-back-office-outsourcing

About Re-Sourcing Group

Re-Sourcing is a leading professional services firm, offering staffing, consulting and direct hire services that specialize in finance & accounting, legal & compliance and information technology. Re-Sourcing serves clients through its distinguished portfolio of premium brands, including Compliance Risk Concepts, Conexus, JW Michaels, ExecuSource, Perennial Resources, Partnership Employment and Technology Navigators. Founded in 2003, Re-Sourcing and its brands are strategically located in 20 offices across 10 markets nationwide. Re-Sourcing’s differentiated operating partner model enables a strong focus on building direct relationships with clients to bolster retention and deepen understanding of client needs.

For more information, visit https://www.myresourcing.com/.

About MidOcean Partners

MidOcean Partners is a premier New York-based alternative asset manager specializing in middle-market private equity and alternative credit investments. Since its inception in 2003, MidOcean Private Equity has targeted investments in high-quality middle-market companies in the consumer and business services sectors. MidOcean Credit was launched in 2009 and manages a series of alternative credit strategies, collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) and customized separately managed accounts.

For more information, visit https://www.midoceanpartners.com/.

The post Compliance Risk Concepts Receives Strategic Investment from MidOcean Partners appeared first on Compliance Risk Concepts.

Regulatory News Update: Proposed Amendment to FINRA 3240 (Borrowing From or Lending to Customers)

CRC — Fri, 12 Jan 2024 15:54:38 +0000

What: FINRA has proposed to amend Rule 3240 to strengthen the general prohibition against borrowing and lending arrangements between registered persons and customers.

Who: FINRA member broker-dealers.

When: The proposal to the SEC was initially filed on January 2, 2024. If the SEC approves the change, FINRA will announce the effective date in a Regulatory Notice.

Why: FINRA cited anecdotal evidence from member firms, law clinics, and previous enforcement cases as well as its experience in examining and enforcing for compliance with Rule 3240 that it believed suggests that there is some ambiguity about the scope of Rule 3240 and certain risks to investors due to conflicts of interest and the superior information that registered persons have about potential risks and returns.

How: Among various changes, the proposal adds several new limitations: 1) clarifying that the prohibition applies to arrangements that precede a new broker-customer relationship, 2) extending the rule to arrangements entered into within six months following the end of broker-customer relationship, and 3) to arrangements with parties related (family and businesses) to the registered person and customer. The proposal also narrows existing exceptions based on certain personal and business relationships.

Why it matters: Firms should monitor further developments with this proposal. If the SEC ultimately approves the requested rule change, written supervisory procedures and controls related to this topic will need to be reviewed and may require modifications for compliance with the final requirements. In addition, assuming the final rule change tracks with the proposal, there may be potential operational and training considerations (e.g., account opening and pre-existing arrangements, account terminations and subsequent arrangements, and related-party arrangements).

CRC keeps its thumb on the pulse of the evolving regulatory landscape. Keep an eye out for additional information, including updated guidance, risk alerts, and CRC’s thoughts on how to ensure successful compliance with evolving regulatory expectations within your firm’s existing regulatory compliance program.

Contact Mitch Avnet for further details: (646)346-2468 | mavnet@compliance-risk.com

The post Regulatory News Update: Proposed Amendment to FINRA 3240 (Borrowing From or Lending to Customers) appeared first on Compliance Risk Concepts.

Regulatory News Update: SEC Adopts New Rule Enhancing Short Sale Disclosure

CRC — Thu, 04 Jan 2024 01:42:47 +0000

What: The SEC recently adopted new Rule 13f-2 and related Form SHO and an amendment to the national market system plan governing the consolidated audit trail (CAT) to provide greater transparency of short sale-related data.

Who: Institutional investment managers (“Managers”). Managers are any person, other than a natural person, investing in or buying and selling securities for its own account, and any person exercising investment discretion with respect to the account of any other person - typically includes brokers and dealers, investment advisers, banks, insurance companies, pension funds and corporations.

When: Rule and plan amendment adopted on October 13, 2023, and they become effective on January 2, 2024. The compliance date for Rule 13f-2 and Form SHO will be 12 months after the effective date of the adopting release – with public aggregated reporting to follow 3 months later. The compliance date for the amendment to the CAT NMS Plan will be 18 months after the effective date of the adopting release.

Why: The SEC is adopting Rule 13f-2 and Form SHO to help enhance transparency regarding short selling in equity securities—including both exchange-listed and over-the-counter securities, and ETFs. The SEC believes that, through the publication of short sale-related data to investors and other market participants, the information reported by Managers will provide important additional context to market participants regarding short sale activity in these equity securities by Managers.

How: Under Rule 13f-2, institutional investment managers that meet or exceed certain prescribed reporting thresholds will report on Form SHO certain short position and short activity data for equity securities. The SEC will thereafter aggregate and publish certain data collected from Form SHO.

Why it matters: The SEC estimates that approximately 1,000 Managers per month will trigger a reporting threshold for at least one security and therefore be required to file the new Form SHO. The SEC concluded that it would take about 20 hours per Form SHO filing.

Contact Mitch Avnet for further details: (646)346-2468 | mavnet@compliance-risk.com

The post Regulatory News Update: SEC Adopts New Rule Enhancing Short Sale Disclosure appeared first on Compliance Risk Concepts.

SEC Adopts Amendments to Names Rule

CRC — Wed, 03 Jan 2024 14:31:20 +0000

On September 20, 2023, the SEC adopted amendments to the Investment Company Act “Names Rule,” as well as related disclosure and reporting requirements.

Principal Elements

Expands Scope

The rule’s 80% investment policy requirement will be expanded beyond its current scope, to apply to any fund name with terms suggesting that the fund focuses on investments that have, or investments whose issuers have, particular characteristics.
This coverage will include, for example, fund names with terms such as “growth” or “value,” or terms indicating that the fund’s investment decisions incorporate one or more ESG factors.

Temporary Departures from the 80% Investment Requirement

The amendments retain the names rule’s current requirements for a fund to invest in accordance with its 80% investment policy “under normal circumstances” (the “80% investment requirement”), and for the 80% investment requirement to apply at the time a fund invests its assets.
The amendments add a new provision that requires a fund to review its portfolio assets’ inclusion in its “80% basket” at least quarterly.
The amendments include specific time frames—generally 90 days—for getting back into compliance if a fund departs from the 80% requirement as a result of drift or in other-than-normal circumstances.

Derivatives

The amendments generally require funds to use a derivatives instrument’s notional amount to determine the fund’s compliance with its 80% investment policy, with certain adjustments.
The amendments include a limited modification to this approach that would exclude certain currency hedges from the names rule compliance calculation.

Unlisted Registered Closed-End Funds and BDCs

The amendments generally prohibit an unlisted registered closed-end fund or BDC that is required to adopt an 80% investment policy from changing that policy without a shareholder vote.
The amendments permit these funds to change their 80% investment policies without such a vote if:
- the fund conducts a tender or repurchase offer with at least 60 days’ prior notice of the policy change,
- that offer is not oversubscribed, and
- the fund purchases shares at their net asset value.

Enhanced Prospectus Disclosure

The amendments to funds’ prospectus disclosure requirements that will require a fund to define the terms used in its name, including the criteria the fund uses to select the investments that the term describes.

Plain English Requirements for Terms Used in Fund Names

The amendments to the names rule effectively require that any terms used in the fund’s name that suggest either an investment focus, or that the fund’s distributions are tax-exempt, must be consistent with those terms’ plain English meaning or established industry use.

Form N-PORT Reporting Requirements

The amendments to Form N-PORT for funds will require funds to report the value of the fund’s 80% basket, and whether an investment is included in the fund’s 80% basket.
The amendments also include a new reporting item to include the definition(s) of terms used in the fund’s name. Funds will have to report this information for the third month of every quarter, instead of for each month as proposed.

Recordkeeping

The final rules include recordkeeping provisions related to a fund’s compliance with the rule’s requirements.

Compliance Date

Tiered Compliance Period

The compliance date for the final amendments is December 10, 2025 for larger entities, and June 10, 2026 for smaller entities.
- Larger entities are funds that, together with other investment companies in the same “group of related investment companies” (as such term is defined in rule 0-10 under the Investment Company Act [17 CFR 270.0-10]) have net assets of $1 billion or more as of the end of the most recent fiscal year
- Smaller entities are funds that together with other investment companies in the same “group of related investment companies” have net assets of less than $1 billion as of the end of the most recent fiscal year

Compliance Cost Estimates

The SEC project direct compliance costs broadly attributable to the following activities:

reviewing the final rule’s requirements;
determining whether to change a fund’s name or comply with the new requirements, as applicable;
developing new (or modifying existing) practices, reporting, and recordkeeping requirements to align with the requirements of the final rule;
integrating and implementing those practices, reporting, and recordkeeping requirements to the rest of the funds’ activities; and
preparing new training materials and administering training sessions for staff in affected areas.

The SEC estimated that the initial costs to establish and implement practices designed to meet the requirements of the final amendments as described in the adopting release will range from $50,000 to $500,000 per fund, depending on the particular facts and circumstances of the fund. The SEC believes the costs would be closer to the lower end of the range for funds whose current practices are more similar to the requirements of the final rule and for a fund that only incurs costs associated with analyzing the requirements of the rule.

The SEC also concluded that some funds may change their name rather than comply with the amended rule, which it estimated would result in a total direct burden of $75,000 to $250,000 as a one-time cost, including analyzing the rule and deciding to change their name.

Contact Mitch Avnet for further details: (646)346-2468 | mavnet@compliance-risk.com

The post SEC Adopts Amendments to Names Rule appeared first on Compliance Risk Concepts.

Regulatory News Update: SEC Sweep Initiative Targeting AI-Driven Investment Advisers

CRC — Fri, 15 Dec 2023 14:19:35 +0000

December 13, 2023

What: The SEC’s Division of Examinations has initiated a sweep of investment advisers on how AI-based tools are being deployed by the firms across the industry.

Who: Investment advisers in receipt of examination notifications should expect requests related to AI practices, governance, and oversight.

When: Several investment advisers have reported AI-focused request lists in conjunction with recent examinations. CRC expects this trend to continue into 2024.

Why: In light of the SEC’s recent focus on AI-driven investment management services, as well as the proposed rule related to conflicts associated with such activity, a sweep initiative is a commonly-practiced next step for the regulator, and serves primarily as a data collection exercise. In light of findings, advisers should expect modifications to proposed rulemaking, risk alerts, and guidance in this area.

How: Advisers can prepare for AI-focused examinations and request list items by conducting a brief mock-audit of its AI-related policies, procedures, and practices. Firms should be prepared to produce the documents relating to AI use in the event of an SEC request, including (but not limited to):

Itemization of areas and instances where AI-based tools are deployed across the firm, particularly with respect to investment recommendations;
Data security measures relative to AI use;
Policies and procedures related to the use of AI within the firm, particularly with respect to investment recommendations;
An itemization of inputs that drive AI-based recommendations and other activity, including how such information is collected and updated;
Advertising materials and disclosures, including Form ADV, that reference the use of AI, particularly with respect to investment recommendations;
Information related to the development, testing, and ongoing management and oversight of AI tools; and
Plans in place to identify, resolve, and disclose AI system failures, AI-driven errors, and other issues related to AI use.

CRC keeps its thumb on the pulse of the evolving regulatory landscape. Keep an eye out for additional information about the SEC’s AI-driven conflicts proposed rule and new sweep exam initiative, including updated proposals, rule finalization details, and CRC’s thoughts on how to ensure successful integration of new or updated rules within your firm’s existing regulatory compliance program.

Contact Mitch Avnet for further details: (646)346-2468 | mavnet@compliance-risk.com

The post Regulatory News Update: SEC Sweep Initiative Targeting AI-Driven Investment Advisers appeared first on Compliance Risk Concepts.

Regulatory News Update: SIPC Nearing Launch of Broker-Dealer Portal

CRC — Wed, 25 Oct 2023 13:44:15 +0000

October 20, 2023

What: The Securities Investor Protection Corporation (“SIPC”) is nearing the launch of an online portal for Broker-Dealers.

Who: Broker-Dealers (including Broker-Dealers claiming exclusion from SIPC membership)

When: Portal launches on November 1, 2023.

Why: The new portal will allow Broker-Dealers to file forms, pay assessments, and communicate with SIPC.

How: Initial access to the SIPC Portal will be on a staggered basis, based on the broker-dealer’s fiscal year. Each Broker-Dealer’s Chief Compliance Officer (CCO) must either act as the Broker-Dealer’s Portal Administrator or delegate this responsibility to another individual. Check out SIPC’s Portal Administrator Delegation webpage for more details.

Why it matters: Once the SIPC Portal is operational, SIPC will no longer accept filings by mail, email, or fax. Broker-dealers that fail to use the SIPC Portal will not be able to submit required filings with SIPC.

Contact Mitch Avnet for further details: (646)346-2468 | mavnet@compliance-risk.com

The post Regulatory News Update: SIPC Nearing Launch of Broker-Dealer Portal appeared first on Compliance Risk Concepts.

Celebrating a Decade of Success and Growth: Compliance Risk Concepts Turns 10

CRC — Thu, 05 Oct 2023 15:27:32 +0000

Celebrating our 10th anniversary this year, Compliance Risk Concepts (CRC) remains committed to helping businesses succeed while maintaining regulatory compliance. As we reflect on the past decade, we are proud to have assisted numerous clients in reaching their financial, operational, and strategic goals.

"Celebrating CRC's 10-year anniversary is an amazing milestone for the company and for me, personally," said Mitch Avnet, Founder and Managing Partner. Avnet leveraged his 20+ years of in-house expertise and practical experience in professional services by identifying a gap in the industry: organizations needing comprehensive compliance support.

"We are businesspeople who know compliance," continued Avnet. "This unique commercial approach to solving compliance issues, combined with our proactive focus on our clients' future needs, separates us from the 'check-the-box' providers. Our practical, in-depth risk assessments focus on our clients' risk postures and have been our driving force since day one."

The CRC Advantage

What sets CRC apart is our team—business professionals armed with extensive compliance knowledge ready to help our clients navigate increasingly complex laws and regulations. Unlike conventional "check- the-box" providers, CRC thrives on critical thinking and risk assessment, tailoring solutions based on each client's risk appetite.

From thoroughly understanding each client's unique business model to assessing potential risks and creating comprehensive plans to mitigate exposure, CRC has successfully enabled its clients to achieve long-term, strategic, and scalable success.

Service That's Not "One-Size-Fits-All"

With the intensity of regulatory scrutiny at an all-time high, financial institutions must re-examine their compliance approach. For small businesses challenged with handling compliance matters without a dedicated in-house team, we offer ongoing, routine compliance services at a fraction of the cost of traditional resources. Larger organizations with an established in-house team can leverage our services to help manage workload surges and ensure all aspects of business compliance are adequately addressed.

Reflecting on a Decade of Growth

Principal Roland Reyes shared his excitement about the milestone: "The growth of our company is a testament to our team's professionalism, hard work and dedication. It is a pleasure every day to work alongside the best and brightest. It has been an incredible ten years. I am excited to see what the next will bring."

Culture of Collaboration

Our COO, Jaclyn Bowdren, believes this anniversary validates CRC's core values. "CRC's team is what sets us apart," said Bowdren. "CRC fosters a collaborative environment, where our team members work together to provide the best advice and guidance for our clients. We understand our clients and provide solutions that balance their risk with their commercial interests. We always strive to be valued partners to our clients; this has been pivotal to our success."

"I plan to continue work to build upon the success of CRC by listening to our team and clients to find additional opportunities for improvement and growth. I could not imagine working with a better group of people, and I look forward to seeing how we can work together to further build this incredible company."

Building a Future of Trust and Growth

Adding another perspective, Debbie Nathanson, our Senior HR Advisor, identifies industry expertise, client trust, and supportive team culture as the drivers of our success. She joined CRC about 2.5 years ago, and the team has since doubled in size. "Ten years is a milestone that announces staying power in the industry," said Nathanson. "It tells current and future staff that exciting times are still to come, and CRC will only become an even better place to work."

"CRCs success is a direct result of industry expertise, amazing client relationships and a truly unique and supportive employee culture. We know what we are doing. Our clients like and trust us. Our team likes and trusts each other. The future of CRC is supported by our past. We will continue to hire experienced professionals, provide expert advice and service, and respect each other."

Delivering on Our Promises

David Amster, Principal, aligned with the team's sentiments, commenting, "CRC's tenth anniversary validates the value proposition on which the firm has focused since day one; we expertly balance compliance solutions that keep our clients out of the regulatory crosshairs without hampering their business interests. CRC has thrived for a decade because that is what we've consistently delivered."

"CRC's success is firmly rooted in our culture," Amster continued. "We're professionals who deeply believe that our company's success is driven by helping our clients succeed. But while we're acutely serious about the quality of our work product, we love to laugh and don't take ourselves all too seriously."

Looking to the Future

As we celebrate this milestone, we look forward to the coming years with enthusiasm, fully committed to continuing to deliver exceptional compliance support services. With a team of senior compliance professionals and executives, CRC helps clients establish, maintain, and enhance their compliance programs.

Thanks to our incredible team, valued clients, and all those who have supported and helped shape CRC over the years, we're proud to celebrate this 10-year milestone in our journey. Contact us to learn more about partnering with CRC.

The post Celebrating a Decade of Success and Growth: Compliance Risk Concepts Turns 10 appeared first on Compliance Risk Concepts.

Monthly Regulatory Summary (September 2023)

CRC — Sun, 01 Oct 2023 03:56:25 +0000

As the regulatory landscape is constantly evolving, Compliance Risk Concepts (“CRC”) is issuing its monthly review and summary of FINRA, SEC, and NFA notices and bulletins to assist our clients in keeping abreast of notable regulatory developments and deadlines in an effort to strengthen their compliance and regulatory initiatives.

FINRA

Regulatory Notices

Per Regulatory Notice 23-15, the SEC has amended Rule 15c6-1(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to shorten the standard settlement cycle for most broker-dealer transactions from two business days after the trade date (T+2) to one business day after the trade date (T+1). To aid firms in preparing for this transition, FINRA is updating the Regulatory Extension (REX) system to enable firms to file extension of time requests under the shortened settlement cycle. Firms may file such requests beginning May 31, 2024, via the batch file process and by completing the online request form by logging into the REX system via FINRA Gateway. Further, FINRA is updating the REX Customer Test Environment to allow testing under various scenarios for both batch and online request form filings.

Special Notices

There were no Special Notices in September.

SEC

Final Rules

Per Release No. 33-11235, the SEC is adopting amendments to Volume II of the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval system Filer Manual (“EDGAR Filer Manual” or “Filer Manual”) and related rules and forms. EDGAR Release 23.3 will be deployed in the EDGAR system on September 18, 2023.

Per Release No. 33-11238, the SEC is amending the rule under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“Investment Company Act” or “Act”) that addresses certain broad categories of investment company names that are likely to mislead investors about an investment company’s investments and risks. The amendments to this rule are designed to increase investor protection by improving, and broadening the scope of, the requirement for certain funds to adopt a policy to invest at least 80 percent of the value of their assets in accordance with the investment focus that the fund’s name suggests, updating the rule’s notice requirements, and establishing recordkeeping requirements. The SEC is also adopting enhanced prospectus disclosure requirements for terminology used in fund names, and additional requirements for funds to report information on Form N-PORT regarding compliance with the names-related regulatory requirements.

Per Release No. 34-98437, the SEC is adopting amendments to the SEC’s regulations under the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended (“Privacy Act”). The amendments revise the SEC’s regulations under the Privacy Act to clarify, update, and streamline the language of several procedural provisions.

Proposed Rules

Per Release No. 33-11232, the SEC is proposing rule and form amendments concerning access to and management of accounts on the Commission’s Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval system (“EDGAR”) that are related to potential technical changes to EDGAR (collectively referred to as “EDGAR Next”). The SEC is proposing to require that electronic filers (“filers”) authorize and maintain designated individuals as account administrators and that filers, through their account administrators, take certain actions to manage their accounts on a dashboard on EDGAR. Further, we propose that filers may only authorize individuals as account administrators or in the other roles described herein if those individuals first obtain individual account credentials in the manner to be specified in the EDGAR Filer Manual. As part of the EDGAR Next changes, the SEC would offer filers optional Application Programming Interfaces (“APIs”) for machine-to-machine communication with EDGAR, including submission of filings and retrieval of related information. If the proposed rule and form amendments are adopted, the SEC would make corresponding changes to the EDGAR Filer Manual and implement the potential technical changes.

Per Release No. 33-11250, the SEC is proposing rule and form amendments to provide a tailored form to register the offerings of registered index-linked annuities (“RILAs”). Specifically, the SEC is proposing to amend the form currently used by most variable annuity separate accounts, Form N-4, to require issuers of RILAs to register offerings on that form as well. To facilitate this amendment, the SEC is also proposing to amend certain filing rules and make other related amendments. These changes would, if adopted, implement the requirements relating to RILAs contained in Division AA, Title I of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023. Further, the SEC is proposing other amendments to Form N-4 that would apply to all issuers that would use that form under the proposal. The SEC is also proposing to apply to RILA advertisements and sales literature a current SEC rule that provides guidance as to when sales literature is materially misleading under the Federal securities laws. The SEC is proposing a technical amendment to Form N-6 to correct an error from a prior SEC rulemaking. Finally, the SEC requests comment as to whether to require the registration of market-value adjustments associated with certain annuities on Form N-4 as well.

Interim Final Rules

There were no interim final rules in September.

Interpretive Releases

There were no interpretive releases in September.

Policy Statements

There were no policy statements in September.

NFA

Notices to Members

Notice I-23-16

September 8, 2023

Board and Nominating Committee Members Whose Terms Will Expire at the Board's 2024 Regular Annual Meeting and Executive Representative Reminder

On November 17, 2022, NFA's Board of Directors unanimously approved amendments to NFA's Articles of Incorporation (Articles)¹. As a result, effective February 2024, NFA's Board will be reduced from 29 to 21 Directors, and the terms of all current Directors will expire at the Board's regular Annual Meeting on February 15, 2024.

Each year, prior to October 15th, NFA's Secretary notifies all Members of the elected Board Directors and Nominating Committee members whose terms will expire at the Board of Directors' regular annual meeting in the following categories: FCM and LTM; IB; CPO and CTA; and SD, MSP and RFED. Given NFA's Board's reduction, the attached list of Board members whose terms expire in February 2024 contains the names of all current Directors in the Member categories. Also attached is a list of Nominating Committee members in each of the Member categories whose terms expire in February 2024.

NFA's Secretary requests Members to recommend eligible persons to the Nominating Committee for consideration to fill each open Board position and the open Nominating Committee position for each Board category. Incumbent Directors, if otherwise eligible, may be recommended to the Nominating Committee. The specific criteria regarding the composition of the representatives in each Member category on the Board of Directors and the Nominating Committee is provided below. Please use the attached form to submit names of persons eligible to fill the vacancies on the Board of Directors and the Nominating Committee.

The Nominating Committee will consider the names that are submitted and nominate at least one person for each open Board position and one person for each open Nominating Committee position. Thereafter, additional nominations may be made by petition pursuant to NFA's Articles. Upon completion of its work, NFA will issue a Notice to Members announcing the Nominating Committee's nominations to fill the Board and Nominating Committee vacancies, which will also provide the procedures for filing a nomination by petition.

NFA's Board of Directors and Open Positions as of the February 15, 2024 Board of Directors' Regular Annual Meeting

Since all Directors' terms will expire at the February 2024 Board meeting, the following vacancies must be filled:

Four (4) FCM representatives of which two (2) must be FCMs ranked as a top-ten FCM and (2) must be FCMs not ranked as a top-ten FCM based on the total of futures customer segregated funds, cleared swaps customer collateral and foreign futures or foreign options secured amounts (customer segregated funds), as those terms are defined in the applicable Commission regulations, held as of June 30 preceding the election;

One (1) IB representative;

Three (3) representatives of CPOs or CTAs that are NFA Members reporting funds under management allocated to futures and swaps (as defined in Article XVIII) on NFA Form PQR or NFA Form PR as of June 30 preceding the election (Funds Under Management) of which one (1) representative must be a CPO or CTA ranked within the top 10 percent based on Funds Under Management; one (1) representative must be a CPO or CTA ranked within the top 20 percent based on Funds Under Management; and one (1) is an at-large representative from CPOs or CTAs with no restriction on its rank among CPOs and CTAs reporting Funds Under Management; and

Four (4) SD/MSP/RFED representatives of which two (2) must be representatives of SDs that are Large Financial Institutions as of June 30 preceding the election and two (2) representatives of SDs, MSPs or RFEDs that are not Large Financial Institutions as of June 30 preceding the election. NFA's Board of Directors has resolved to use the list of Participating Dealers on the Federal Reserve Bank of New York's website on a designated webpage "OTC Derivatives Supervisors Group" to define Large Financial Institutions.

Nominating Committee Open Positions

Nominating Committee open positions for the 2024 Member election:

One (1) open position for an FCM Representative who may be affiliated with either a top-ten FCM or a non-top ten FCM based on customer segregated funds as of June 30 preceding the election;
One (1) open position for an IB Representative who may be affiliated with either a Guaranteed IB or an Independent IB;
One (1) open position for a CPO/CTA Representative who must be affiliated with a CPO or CTA ranked within the top ten percent based on Funds Under Management; and
One (1) open position for an SD/MSP/RFED Representative who is affiliated with an SD/MSP/RFED of a Non-Large Financial Institution as of June 30 preceding the election.

NFA is a membership organization. NFA Members have a voice in NFA's governance through the exercise of the right to recommend candidates and to nominate and elect individuals to serve on NFA's Nominating Committee and Board of Directors. The Nominating Committee relies heavily on the recommendations of the membership in making its nominating decisions. Please give this matter serious consideration and return your submission(s) to NFA for receipt no later than September 29, 2023.

Notice I-23-17

September 20, 2023

FCM and IB Members—FinCEN issues alert on virtual currency investment scam known as "Pig Butchering"

On September 8, 2023, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) issued a news release alerting U.S. financial institutions of a prominent virtual currency investment scam known as “pig butchering.” The alert explains the scam’s methodology; provides behavioral, financial, and technical red flags to help financial institutions identify and report related suspicious activity; and reminds financial institutions of their reporting requirements under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA). As U.S. financial institutions under the BSA, NFA Member futures commission merchants and introducing brokers should review the alert and comply with the suspicious activity report (SAR) requirements if applicable.

News Releases

September 12, 2023

NFA orders Denver-based firm Transamerica Asset Management Inc. to pay a $140,000 fine and sanctions a former Transamerica employee

September 12, Chicago—NFA issued Decisions against Transamerica Asset Management Inc. (Transamerica), an NFA Member commodity pool operator located in Denver, Colorado, and its former employee, Quynh Pham Keiser, resolving charges brought against them by NFA's Business Conduct Committee (Committee or BCC).

The BCC Decisions are based on a Complaint issued by the Committee and separate settlement offers submitted by Transamerica and Keiser, in which they neither admitted nor denied the Complaint's allegations. In the Transamerica Decision, the BCC found Transamerica failed to diligently supervise the firm's operations, in violation of NFA Compliance Rule 2-9(a), and ordered Transamerica to pay a $140,000 fine to NFA. In the Keiser Decision, the BCC found Keiser willfully submitted materially false or misleading information to NFA, in violation of NFA Compliance Rule 2-2(f), and ordered Keiser not to reapply for NFA associate membership, apply for NFA membership or principal status with a Member, or act as a principal of a Member at any time in the future.

The complete text of the Complaint, the Transamerica Decision, and the Keiser Decision can be viewed on NFA's website.

September 18, 2023

NFA takes emergency enforcement action against Doral, Fla. commodity pool operator Bit5ive Mining Fund Advisor, LLC and its principal Richard Alexander Acosta

September 18, Chicago—NFA has taken an emergency enforcement action against Bit5ive Mining Fund Advisor, LLC, (Bit5ive Advisor), an NFA Member commodity pool operator located in Doral, Florida, and Richard Alexander Acosta, a listed principal and the sole associated person of Bit5ive Advisor.

NFA took this action to protect participants in Bit5ive Mining Fund LP, a commodity pool operated by Bit5ive Advisor, as well as the investing public, the derivatives markets, and other NFA Members because of Bit5ive Advisor and Acosta's failure to cooperate with NFA. Due to their failure to produce requested documents and information, NFA is unable to determine, among other things, who invested in the Fund, as well as when and how much; whether there are additional investors in the Fund other than those disclosed to NFA; what Bit5ive Advisor and Acosta did with the funds received for investment in the Fund; and the source of funds used to repay one investor.

Effective immediately, Bit5ive Advisor and Acosta are suspended from NFA membership and prohibited from soliciting or accepting any funds for investment in the Fund or in any other pools or other investment vehicles over which Bit5ive Advisor or Acosta exercise control. Bit5ive Advisor and Acosta are further prohibited from disbursing or transferring any funds from any accounts in the name of Bit5ive Advisor, Bit5ive Fund, or from the account of any other commodity pool or other investment vehicle operated by Bit5ive Advisor or Acosta, without NFA's prior approval. This action will remain in effect until Bit5ive Advisor and Acosta demonstrate to NFA's satisfaction that they are in complete compliance with all NFA requirements.

Bit5ive Advisor or Acosta may request a hearing before NFA's Hearing Committee.

The complete text of the emergency action is available on NFA's website.

September 18, 2023

NFA orders Houston-based introducing broker Bosworth Brokers LLC and one of its principals to each pay a $100,000 fine

September 18, Chicago—NFA has ordered Bosworth Brokers LLC, an NFA Member introducing broker located in Houston, Texas, and Andrew Michael Gizienski, a principal and associated person of Bosworth Brokers LLC, to each pay a $100,000 fine.

The Decision, issued by an NFA Hearing Panel, is based on a Complaint authorized by NFA's Business Conduct Committee (BCC) and a settlement offer submitted by Bosworth Brokers LLC, Gizienski and Dennis Michael Bosworth, another principal and AP of Bosworth Brokers LLC, in which they neither admitted nor denied the Complaint's allegations. The BCC Complaint alleged that Bosworth Brokers LLC failed to comply with its recordkeeping obligations under NFA Compliance Rule 2-10 and that Gizienski failed to observe high standards of commercial honor and just and equitable principles of trade under NFA Compliance Rule 2-4, due to Gizienski's use of an unapproved, unmonitored platform to communicate with a Bosworth Brokers LLC customer, which deleted communications after seven days. The Complaint also alleged that Bosworth Brokers LLC failed to promptly list Gizienski as a principal, in violation of NFA Registration Rule 208. Finally, the Complaint alleged that Bosworth Brokers LLC and Bosworth failed to supervise, in violation of NFA Compliance Rule 2-9.

In its Decision, the Panel found that Bosworth Brokers LLC and Bosworth violated NFA Compliance Rule 2-9; that Bosworth Brokers LLC violated NFA Compliance Rule 2-10 and NFA Registration Rule 208; and that Gizienski violated NFA Compliance Rule 2-4.

The complete text of the Complaint and the Decision can be viewed on NFA's website.

September 25, 2023

NFA permanently bars Chicago-based commodity pool operator Tyche Asset Management LLC and its principal Phillip Moncel Galles from membership

September 25, Chicago—NFA has permanently barred Tyche Asset Management LLC, a former NFA Member commodity pool operator (CPO) located in Chicago, Illinois, and Phillip Moncel Galles, a former NFA Associate and principal of Tyche Asset Management LLC, from NFA membership status and from acting or being listed as a principal of an NFA Member.

The default Decision, issued by NFA's Business Conduct Committee (BCC), is based on a Complaint issued by the BCC and Tyche Asset Management LLC and Galles' failure to file an Answer. The BCC found that Tyche Asset Management LLC and Galles engaged in a deceitful course of conduct to defraud customers and failed to uphold high standards of commercial honor and just and equitable principles of trade in connection with a commodity pool or other investment vehicle that Tyche Asset Management LLC and/or Galles operated. The BCC also found that Tyche Asset Management LLC and Galles provided misleading information to NFA about the firm's activities as a CPO and failed to cooperate promptly with NFA during an examination.

The complete text of the Complaint and Decision can be viewed on NFA's website.

Hot Issue

At the end of September, the SEC continued with its enforcement actions for failing to preserve electronic communications. The SEC’s investigations uncovered pervasive and longstanding off-channel communications at 10 more firms. The firms agreed to pay combined penalties of $79 million. These actions follow on the heels of similar charges against 11 other firms only the previous month that resulted in $289 million in combined penalties.

With the sustained SEC enforcement concerning communications recordkeeping, firms should ensure that they have recently reviewed their communications surveillance policies and procedures, particularly those involving personal mobile devices and messaging applications. In this context, CRC believes that it is more of a question of when – not if – firms will face questions about off-channel communications as part of an examination or other focused requests from the SEC and/or FINRA.

Our Perspective

Regulators continue to demonstrate their commitment to protecting investors by aggressively pursuing bad actors and reviewing and updating regulations to guard investors against constantly evolving threats.

The best approach to regulatory compliance is a proactive one. Staying ahead of the curve by taking note of statements and guidance released by regulators and using them as a barometer to assess the current regulatory climate can help ensure that a firm is prepared for a regulatory exam. Rather than scrambling to rectify issues or meet deadlines, a thorough, active compliance program that considers and incorporates regulatory developments is in a better position to satisfy regulators and preserve operations so they can best serve their clients.

For more information, please contact:

Mitch Avnet

p. (646) 346-2468

mavnet@compliance-risk.com

David Amster

p. (917) 568-6470

damster@compliance-risk.com

Sources:

FINRA Notices
SEC Regulatory Actions
NFA Notices
NFA New Releases

The post Monthly Regulatory Summary (September 2023) appeared first on Compliance Risk Concepts.

Regulatory News Update: Citadel Prepared to Take Legal Action Against SEC Amid WhatsApp Probe

CRC — Fri, 29 Sep 2023 17:16:46 +0000

September 29, 2023

Bloomberg reported that Citadel has indicated it is planning to push back against the SEC if it moves against the firm, going so far as to take the SEC to court. Such a court case would be a first among firms against whom the SEC has made allegations of untracked communications.

This update follows a Reuters article earlier in the week that identified Citadel among a group of more than two dozen investment advisers from whom the SEC has reportedly requested messages on personal devices or applications of a selection of employees, including senior management.

The SEC’s approach appears to put senior executives at risk as a matter of course in these investigations. As noted in the reporting, the general review of business communications on personal devices opens the door to a range of inquiry. This transforms what may have been seen as a books and record issue into an entry point for the SEC to take an interest in the underlying substantive communications, which could relate to any aspect of the business, transactions, dealings with customers, etc.

Additionally, executives who are found to have violated their employer’s compliance policies regarding off-channel communications may face employment consequences.

CRC will continue to monitor developments in what could result in the first legal challenge to the SEC’s recent off-channel communications approach to investment advisers, however, despite the potential for a legal challenge from the industry, any resolution is speculative and does not change the reality for firms at the present. Our view is that firms should be very focused on taking steps now to understand and mitigate their risks related to electronic communications to better position themselves ahead of a regulator request or examination.

CRC keeps its thumb on the pulse of the evolving regulatory landscape. Keep an eye out for additional information about this developing situation, as well as the SEC’s continued focus on electronic communications, including updated guidance, risk alerts, and CRC’s thoughts on how to ensure successful compliance with evolving regulatory expectations within your firm’s existing regulatory compliance program.

Contact Mitch Avnet for further details: (646)346-2468 | mavnet@compliance-risk.com

The post Regulatory News Update: Citadel Prepared to Take Legal Action Against SEC Amid WhatsApp Probe appeared first on Compliance Risk Concepts.

News Update: SEC Provides Road Map for Investment Advisory Firm Examinations

CRC — Thu, 28 Sep 2023 15:25:02 +0000

September 2023

Overview & Summary

On Sept. 6, 2023, the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Examinations issued a Risk Alert detailing the Division’s examination selection process for SEC-registered investment advisers.

Given the size and variety of the adviser population, the Division utilizes a risk-based approach for both selecting advisers to examine and in determining the scope of risk areas to examine. The Risk Alert highlights the Division’s risk-based approach for both (A) selecting Advisers to examine and (B) determining examination focus areas and documents. The Division leverages technology to collect and analyze large sets of industry- and firm-level data to help identify risks and better understand the firm’s business during examinations. The Division also reviews disclosure documents and various filings with regulators (e.g., Form ADV) and other regulatory filings.

A. Selecting Firms to Examine

Some of the reasons the Division may select an adviser to examine include, but are not limited to, one or more of the following: the firm’s risk characteristics; a tip, complaint, or referral; or the staff’s interest in a particular compliance risk area.

There are also firm-specific risk factors that the staff considers when selecting advisers for examination, such as those related to a particular adviser’s business activities, conflicts of interest, and regulatory history. In the Risk Alert, the Division lists 11 firm-specific factors it may consider: (1) prior examination observations and conduct, such as when the staff has observed what it believes to be repetitive deficient practices during more than one review of a firm, significant fee- and expense-related issues, and significant compliance program concerns; (2) supervisory concerns, such as disciplinary history of associated individuals or affiliates; (3) tips, complaints, or referrals involving the firm; (4) business activities of the firm or its personnel that may create conflicts of interest, such as outside business activities and the conflicts associated with advisers dually registered as, or affiliated with, brokers; (5) the length of time since the firm’s registration or last examination, such as advisers newly registered with the SEC; (6) material changes in a firm’s leadership or other personnel; (7) indications that the adviser might be vulnerable to financial or market stresses; (8) reporting by news and media that may involve or impact the firm; (9) data provided by certain third-party data services; (10) the disclosure history of the firm; and (11) whether the firm has access to client and investor assets and/or presents certain gatekeeper or service provider compliance risks.

B. Selecting Examination Focus Areas

Once an adviser is selected for examination, additional risk assessment occurs to determine the scope of the examination, such as selecting areas of the business that examiners will review. This involves requesting documents with respect to the firm’s operations, disclosures, conflicts of interest, and compliance practices related to core areas, including custody and safekeeping of client assets, valuation, portfolio management, fees, expenses, brokerage, and best execution.

The Risk Alert includes an attachment that outlines the types of information and documents the staff requests during a typical exam. The list includes (1) general information about the Adviser’s business and investment activities, (2) information about the assessment of risks and the implementation of a written compliance program and internal controls, (3) information with respect to advisory trading activities, and (4) information for compliance testing in particular areas.

The Division is providing this information so that advisers may prepare themselves for an examination. Although the Division continuously refines and enhances its risk assessment process, the information shared herein also may assist firms in their compliance efforts.

Our Take

This SEC Risk Alert lays out how the SEC approaches the selection of firms for examination, as well as their selection examination focus areas. In doing so, the SEC has essentially established a step-by-step guide for Advisers to follow relative to examination preparedness.CRC recommends that firms consider partnering with an established compliance team who can help you navigate and prepare for future examinations. A mock examination utilizing the document request areas outlined within the Risk Alert should serve as an accurate predictor of overall examination preparedness.

Opportunities for CRC to Assist Your Firm

CRC will conduct a mock examination to identify any gaps or weaknesses relative to your firm’s examination preparedness.
CRC is available for general and ongoing outsourced support with respect to SEC-registered investment advisers.
CRC can proactively conduct a review of your existing compliance program to identify opportunities to potentially implement enhancements in preparation for regulatory examinations.
CRC is available to assist with examination responses.

Please contact Mitch Avnet for more information.

Mitch Avnet at mavnet@compliance-risk.com or (646) 346.2468

The post News Update: SEC Provides Road Map for Investment Advisory Firm Examinations appeared first on Compliance Risk Concepts.

Monthly Regulatory Summary (August 2023)

CRC — Fri, 01 Sep 2023 03:48:26 +0000

FINRA

Regulatory Notices

Per Regulatory Notice 23-12, FINRA has adopted amendments to its Codes of Arbitration Procedure (Codes) to modify the process relating to requests to expunge customer dispute information in the FINRA Dispute Resolution Services (DRS) arbitration forum. The amendments impose requirements on expungement requests (a) filed by an associated person during an investment-related, customer-initiated arbitration (customer arbitration), or filed by a party to the customer arbitration on behalf of an associated person (on-behalf-of request), or (b) filed by an associated person separate from a customer arbitration (straight-in request). The amendments become effective on October 16, 2023. The rule text is available in Attachment A. The Guidance is available in Attachment B. The Form Requesting Expungement on Behalf of an Unnamed Person is available in Attachment C.

Per Regulatory Notice 23-13, FINRA has adopted changes to its rules to allow for video conference hearings before the Office of Hearing Officers and the National Adjudicatory Council under specified conditions. These amendments became effective August 23, 2023.

Per Regulatory Notice 23-14, FINRA has amended the requirements relating to Covered Agency Transactions that FINRA originally adopted in 2016. Covered Agency Transactions include (1) To Be Announced transactions, inclusive of adjustable rate mortgage transactions, (2) Specified Pool Transactions and (3) transactions in Collateralized Mortgage Obligations, issued in conformity with a program of an agency or Government-Sponsored Enterprise, with forward settlement dates, as recapped more fully in this Notice.

This Notice provides an overview of the amendments. The SEC approved the amendments on July 27, 2023. FINRA stated in its rule filing, and the SEC noted in approving the rule change, that the amendments would become effective between nine and ten months following the SEC’s approval. Consistent with this timeframe, the amendments become effective on May 22, 2024. FINRA will monitor the implementation of the amendments and their impact. Prior to the May 22, 2024, effective date, FINRA will engage with market participants to make available updated guidance as appropriate.

The text of the amendments to the Covered Agency Transaction requirements is included as Attachment A. In this Notice, all references to provisions of the amended requirements are to the rule text as shown in Attachment A.

Special Notices

There were no Special Notices in August.

SEC

Final Rules

Per Release No. 34-98202, the SEC is adopting amendments to a rule under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act” or “Exchange Act”) that exempts certain SEC-registered brokers or dealers from membership in a registered national securities association (“Association”). The amendments replace rule provisions that provide an exemption for proprietary trading with narrower exemptions from Association membership for any registered broker or dealer that is a member of a national securities exchange, carries no customer accounts, and effects transactions in securities otherwise than on a national securities exchange of which it is a member. The amendments create exemptions for such a registered broker or dealer that effects securities transactions otherwise than on an exchange of which it is a member that result solely from orders that are routed by a national securities exchange of which it is a member to comply with order protection regulatory requirements, or are solely for the purpose of executing the stock leg of a stock-option order.

Per Release No. IA-6383, the SEC is adopting new rules under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“Advisers Act” or “Act”). The rules are designed to protect investors who directly or indirectly invest in private funds by increasing visibility into certain practices involving compensation schemes, sales practices, and conflicts of interest through disclosure; establishing requirements to address such practices that have the potential to lead to investor harm; and restricting practices that are contrary to the public interest and the protection of investors. These rules are likewise designed to prevent fraud, deception, or manipulation by the investment advisers to those funds. Specifically, the new rules require registered investment advisers to private funds to provide transparency to their investors regarding the fees and expenses and other terms of their relationship with private fund advisers and the performance of such private funds. The new rules also require a registered private fund adviser to obtain an annual financial statement audit of each private fund it advises and, in connection with an adviser-led secondary transaction, a fairness opinion or valuation opinion from an independent opinion provider. In addition, the new rules restrict all private fund advisers, including those that are not registered with the SEC, from engaging in certain activities unless they provide specified disclosure to and, for certain restricted activities, obtain consent from investors. All private fund advisers are also prohibited from providing certain types of preferential treatment that would have a material, negative effect on other investors, subject to certain exceptions; and other types of preferential treatment to any investor in a private fund, unless the adviser satisfies certain disclosure obligations. The SEC is adopting corresponding amendments to the Advisers Act books and records rule to facilitate compliance with these new rules and assist our examination staff. Finally, the SEC is adopting amendments to the Advisers Act compliance rule, which affect all registered investment advisers, to better enable SEC staff to conduct examinations.

Proposed Rules

Per Release No. IA-6384, the SEC is reopening the comment period for its proposal, Safeguarding Advisory Client Assets, Release No. IA-6240 (Feb. 15, 2023) (“Proposal”), which proposed a new rule under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“Advisers Act” or “Act”) that would redesignate and amend the current custody rule. In light of the adoption of the private fund adviser audit rule, which generally requires a registered investment adviser to obtain an annual financial statement audit of each private fund it advises in accordance with the audit provision of the current custody rule, reopening the comment period will allow interested persons additional time to assess the proposed amendments to the current custody rule’s audit provision in light of the private fund adviser audit rule.

Interim Final Rules

There were no interim final rules in August.

Interpretive Releases

There were no interpretive releases in August.

Policy Statements

There were no policy statements in August.

NFA

Notices to Members

There were no NFA Notices to Members in August.

News Releases

There were no NFA news releases in August.

Hot Issue

In August, the SEC continued with its enforcement actions against broker-dealers for failing to preserve electronic communications. According to the SEC, this brings the total to 30 enforcement actions and $1.5 billion in penalties. In what is becoming a familiar script, the firms admitted that their employees (including supervisors and executives) often communicated through various messaging platforms on personal devices about the business of their employers, which were often not preserved in violation of federal securities laws. The SEC’s sustained enforcement activity in this area strongly suggests that firms should not delay taking the initiative to conduct meaningful reviews of their communication practices, policies and procedures.

Our Perspective

For more information, please contact:

Mitch Avnet

p. (646) 346-2468

mavnet@compliance-risk.com

David Amster

p. (917) 568-6470

damster@compliance-risk.com

Sources:

FINRA Notices
SEC Regulatory Actions
SEC Press Release 2023-149

The post Monthly Regulatory Summary (August 2023) appeared first on Compliance Risk Concepts.

Monthly Regulatory Summary (July 2023)

CRC — Tue, 01 Aug 2023 03:33:07 +0000

FINRA

Regulatory Notices

There were no Regulatory Notices in July.

Special Notices

There were no Special Notices in July.

SEC

Final Rules

Per Release No. 33-11211, the SEC is adopting amendments to certain rules that govern money market funds under the Investment Company Act of 1940. These amendments are designed to improve the resilience and transparency of money market funds. The amendments will revise the primary rule that governs money market funds to remove the ability for a fund board to temporarily suspend redemptions if the fund’s liquidity falls below a threshold. In addition, the amendments will remove the tie between liquidity thresholds and the potential imposition of liquidity fees. The amendments will also require certain money market funds to implement a liquidity fee framework that will better allocate the costs of providing liquidity to redeeming investors. In addition, the SEC is increasing the daily liquid asset and weekly liquid asset minimum requirements to 25% and 50%, respectively. The SEC also is amending certain reporting requirements on Form N-MFP and Form N-CR and making certain conforming changes to Form N-1A to reflect amendments to the regulatory framework for money market funds. In addition, the SEC is addressing how money market funds with stable net asset values may handle a negative interest rate environment, including by adopting amendments that will permit these funds to use share cancellation, subject to certain conditions. Further, the SEC is adopting rule amendments to specify how funds must calculate weighted average maturity and weighted average life. In addition, the SEC is adopting amendments to Form PF concerning the information large liquidity fund advisers must report for the liquidity funds they advise. Finally, the SEC is adopting two technical amendments to Form N-CSR and Form N-1A to correct errors from recent Commission rulemakings.

Per Release No. 33-11216, the SEC is adopting new rules to enhance and standardize disclosures regarding cybersecurity risk management, strategy, governance, and incidents by public companies that are subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Specifically, the SEC is adopting amendments to require current disclosure about material cybersecurity incidents. The SEC is also adopting rules requiring periodic disclosures about a registrant’s processes to assess, identify, and manage material cybersecurity risks, management’s role in assessing and managing material cybersecurity risks, and the board of directors’ oversight of cybersecurity risks. Lastly, the final rules require the cybersecurity disclosures to be presented in Inline eXtensible Business Reporting Language (“Inline XBRL”).

Proposed Rules

Per Release No. 34-97877, the SEC proposes to amend the broker-dealer customer protection rule to require certain broker-dealers to perform their customer and broker-dealer reserve computations and make any required deposits into their reserve bank accounts daily rather than weekly. The SEC also is seeking comment on whether similar daily reserve computation requirements should apply to broker-dealers and security-based swap dealers with respect to their security-based swap customers.

Comments should be received on or before September 11, 2023.

Per Release No. 34-97990, the SEC is proposing new rules (“proposed conflicts rules”) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“Advisers Act”) to eliminate, or neutralize the effect of, certain conflicts of interest associated with broker-dealers’ or investment advisers’ interactions with investors through these firms’ use of technologies that optimize for, predict, guide, forecast, or direct investment-related behaviors or outcomes. The SEC is also proposing amendments to rules under the Exchange Act and Advisers Act that would require firms to make and maintain certain records in accordance with the proposed conflicts rules.

The public comment period will remain open until 60 days after the date of publication of the proposing release in the Federal Register.

Per Release No. IA-6354, the SEC is proposing amendments to the rule under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 that exempts certain investment advisers that provide advisory services through the internet (“internet investment advisers”) from the prohibition on Commission registration, as well as related amendments to Form ADV. The proposed amendments are designed to modernize the rule’s conditions to account for the evolution in technology and the investment advisory industry since the adoption of the rule.

The public comment period will remain open until 60 days after the date of publication of the proposing release in the Federal Register.

Interim Final Rules

There were no interim final rules in July.

Interpretive Releases

There were no interpretive releases in July.

Policy Statements

There were no policy statements in July.

NFA

Notices to Members

Notice I-23-14

July 10, 2023

FCM and IB Members—FinCEN updates its list of FATF-identified jurisdictions with AML/CFT deficiencies

On June 29, 2023, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) issued a news release informing U.S. financial institutions of the Financial Action Task Force's (FATF) recent public statement. The statement reiterates that all jurisdictions should be vigilant of current and emerging risks from the circumvention of measures taken against the Russian Federation in order to protect the international financial system. The release also announced that the FATF reissued its list of jurisdictions with strategic AML/CFT deficiencies. NFA Member futures commission merchants (FCM) and introducing brokers (IB) should review this release to ensure that their AML programs have the most current information on FATF-identified jurisdictions with AML/CFT deficiencies and revise their AML programs accordingly. A copy of the news release is available on FinCEN's website.

Notice I-23-15

July 25, 2023

Effective date for repeal of NFA Interpretive Notice regarding reduced NFA assessment fee for diminutive notional value-designated contracts

NFA recently repealed its Interpretive Notice entitled NFA Bylaw 1301(b): NFA's Assessment Fee-Diminutive Notional Value Contracts and Security Futures Products, to eliminate the reduced assessment fee for security futures products (SFP) and diminutive notional value (DNV)-designated contracts. This action becomes effective on January 1, 2024, at which time DNV-designated contracts¹ will be subject to the assessment fee under NFA Bylaw 1301. The fee is currently $.04 per round turn. NFA's Board of Directors unanimously approved this repeal after concluding that NFA's regulatory oversight costs are the same for DNV-designated contracts as they are for other exchange traded futures products, and therefore the assessment fee should be the same.

News Releases

There were no NFA news releases in July.

Hot Issue

Broker-dealers and Investment Advisers, particularly FinTech firms, should monitor the SEC’s recent proposed rulemaking around conflicts of interest and predictive data analytics. Although any final rule would likely incorporate some changes resulting from public comments, the rule proposal demonstrates the SEC’s intent to build upon existing regulatory protections to address conflicts of interest from the use of artificial intelligence, predictive data analytics, or similar technologies in investor interactions. Firms that use or plan to use such technologies may want to begin planning for review of its processes for the purposes of identifying and evaluating potential conflicts of interest between the firm and its customers resulting from its use of predictive technologies. Such proactive steps will position firms to better gauge any potential impact to its business operations as the rulemaking proceeds.

Our Perspective

For more information, please contact:

Mitch Avnet

p. (646) 346-2468

mavnet@compliance-risk.com

David Amster

p. (917) 568-6470

damster@compliance-risk.com

Sources:

SEC Regulatory Actions
NFA Notice to Members

The post Monthly Regulatory Summary (July 2023) appeared first on Compliance Risk Concepts.

Monthly Regulatory Summary (June 2023)

CRC — Fri, 30 Jun 2023 13:38:48 +0000

FINRA

Regulatory Notices

Per Regulatory Notice 23-11, FINRA is soliciting comment on a concept proposal to establish liquidity risk management requirements. The concept proposal describes a potential rule, labeled Rule 4610, that is intended to ensure that members have sufficient liquid assets to meet their funding needs in both normal and stressed conditions. Broadly, the proposal outlines three areas where a potential rule might address liquidity risk, including liquidity stress testing, contingent funding plans and a requirement to maintain sufficient liquidity on a current basis at all times. FINRA is issuing this concept proposal so that any feedback received can be taken into account as FINRA considers a proposed rule; any proposed rule would need to be reviewed and approved by the FINRA Board of Governors, and then filed with and approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission. FINRA welcomes comment on all aspects of the concept proposal, including comment on alternatives to the proposed approach.

The draft text of potential Rule 4610 is included as Attachment A.

Special Notices

There were no Special Notices in June.

SEC

Final Rules

Per Release No. 34-97656, the SEC is adopting a final rule, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), that is designed to prevent fraud, manipulation, and deception in connection with effecting any transaction in, or attempting to effect any transaction in, or purchasing or selling, or inducing or attempting to induce the purchase or sale of, any security-based swap. The rule takes into account the features fundamental to a security-based swap and the broad definitions of purchase and sale under the Exchange Act as they relate to security-based swaps. In addition, the Commission is adopting a final rule, under the Exchange Act, that makes it unlawful for any officer, director, supervised person, or employee of a security-based swap dealer (“SBSD”) or major security-based swap participant (“MSBSP”) (each SBSD and each MSBSP also referred to as an “SBS Entity” and together referred to as “SBS Entities”), or any person acting under such person’s direction, to directly or indirectly take any action to coerce, manipulate, mislead, or fraudulently influence the SBS Entity’s chief compliance officer (“CCO”) in the performance of their duties under the Federal securities laws or the rules and regulations thereunder.

Per Release No. 34-97657, the SEC is adopting rule amendments to implement section 939A(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (“Dodd-Frank Act”), which requires, among other things, that the SEC remove from its regulations any references to credit ratings and substitute in their place alternative standards of creditworthiness. The amendments remove certain existing rule exceptions that reference credit ratings for nonconvertible debt securities, nonconvertible preferred securities, and asset-backed securities and substitute in their place new exceptions that are based on alternative standards of creditworthiness. These substitutes include exceptions for nonconvertible debt securities and nonconvertible preferred securities (together, “Nonconvertible Securities”) of issuers who meet a specified probability of default threshold, as well as exceptions for asset-backed securities that are offered pursuant to an effective shelf registration statement filed on a certain form that is tailored to asset-backed securities offerings. The SEC is also adopting an amendment to a recordkeeping rule applicable to broker-dealers in connection with their reliance on an exception involving probability of default determinations.

Per Release No. 33-11205, the SEC is adopting amendments to Volume II of the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval system (“EDGAR”) Filer Manual (“Filer Manual”) and related rules and forms. EDGAR Release 23.2 will be deployed in the EDGAR system on June 20, 2023.

Proposed Rules

Per Release No. 34-97762, the SEC is reopening the comment period for its proposal, Position Reporting of Large Security-Based Swap Positions, Release No. 34-93784, (Dec. 15, 2021) (“Proposing Release”). In the Proposing Release, the SEC proposed for comment a new rule, which would require any person with a security-based swap position that exceeds a certain threshold to promptly file with the SEC a schedule disclosing certain information related to its security-based swap position (“Proposed Rule”). The SEC is reopening the comment period to allow interested persons an opportunity to comment on the additional analysis and data contained in a staff memorandum that was added to the public comment file on June 20, 2023, including providing comment on questions identified below.

Interim Final Rules

There were no interim final rules in June.

Interpretive Releases

There were no interpretive releases in June.

Policy Statements

There were no policy statements in June.

NFA

Notices to Members

Notice I-23-12

June 5, 2023

Information regarding NFA's upcoming move to new Chicago office space

NFA's Chicago headquarters will move to a new location next week. Effective Monday, June 12th, NFA will be located at 320 South Canal, Suite 2400, Chicago, IL 60606. All mail sent to NFA after June 12th should be sent to the new address.

Notice I-23-13

June 29, 2023

Effective date of amendments to NFA's Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws to implement changes to NFA's governance structure

The CFTC recently approved amendments to NFA's Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws to implement the recommendations of an NFA Board of Directors-appointed Special Committee on NFA Governance. The amendments, which are effective February 15, 2024, will:

Reduce the size of the Board and modify its composition;
Adopt Director and Board Chair term limits;
Require that a Director complete one full two-year term before being eligible to serve as Board Chair;
Eliminate the position of Board Vice Chair;
Reduce the size of the Executive Committee and modify its composition and the process for electing Directors to the Executive Committee;
Create a Nominating and Governance Committee to advise the Board on corporate governance matters, nominate Public Representative candidates and make recommendations to the Board regarding Directors to serve on various Board Committees;
Amend the Public Representative definition;
Modify the composition of the CPO/CTA Nominating Committee to mirror the composition of the CPO/CTA Board category's seats; and
Make other technical amendments.

NFA's Board unanimously approved these amendments at its November 17, 2022, meeting. In accordance with Article XVII, the proposed amendments to NFA's Articles were submitted to a ballot vote of NFA Members, and on February 14, 2023, Corporate Election Services, an external tabulation service overseeing the ballot process, certified that Members voted in favor of the amendments.

NFA's March 13, 2023, submission letter to the CFTC contains more detailed information regarding these amendments.

News Releases

There were no NFA news releases in June.

Hot Issue

Off-channel communications continue to be a hot issue with the SEC with the potential for significant enforcement consequences.

In May, the SEC charged HSBC Securities (USA) Inc. and Scotia Capital (USA) Inc. for widespread and longstanding failures by both firms and their employees to maintain and preserve electronic communications. To settle the charges, HSBC and Scotia agreed to pay penalties of $15 million and $7.5 million, respectively. As described in the SEC’s orders, the firms admitted that their employees often communicated “off-channel” about securities business matters on their personal devices, using messaging platforms, such as WhatsApp. Neither firm maintained or preserved the substantial majority of these communications, in violation of the federal securities laws. The failings involved employees at multiple levels of authority, including supervisors and senior executives.

Our Perspective

For more information, please contact:

Mitch Avnet

p. (646) 346-2468

mavnet@compliance-risk.com

David Amster

p. (917) 568-6470

damster@compliance-risk.com

Sources:

FINRA June 2023 Industry Notices
SEC Regulatory Actions
SEC Press Release 2023-91

NFA Notice to Members

The post Monthly Regulatory Summary (June 2023) appeared first on Compliance Risk Concepts.

Monthly Regulatory Summary (May 2023)

CRC — Fri, 09 Jun 2023 15:15:06 +0000

FINRA

Regulatory Notices

Per Regulatory Notice 23-07, FINRA has adopted amendments to Rule 8312 (FINRA BrokerCheck Disclosure) to release information on BrokerCheck as to whether a particular current or former member firm is currently designated as a Restricted Firm pursuant to FINRA Rules 4111 (Restricted Firm Obligations) and 9561 (Procedures for Regulating Activities Under Rule 4111).

The new rule amendments become effective on June 1, 2023.

The amended rule text is available in Attachment A.

Per Regulatory Notice 23-08, FINRA reminds members of their obligations when selling private placements (i.e., unregistered offerings sold pursuant to the Regulation D safe harbors under Sections 3 and 4 of the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act)). In Regulatory Notice 10-22 (Obligation of Broker-Dealers to Conduct Reasonable Investigations in Regulation D Offerings), FINRA reminded members of their obligations to conduct reasonable investigations of the issuers and the securities they recommend in private offerings made under Regulation D. In the years since FINRA published Regulatory Notice 10-22, the unregistered offering market and the related regulatory landscape have evolved, and FINRA has observed both areas of concern and effective practices in the sales of private placements by members. This Notice updates and supplements the prior guidance in light of those developments and observations. It is not intended to alter the principles or the guidance FINRA provided in prior Regulatory Notices.

This Notice highlights a member’s obligation, when recommending a security, to conduct a reasonable investigation of the security. This duty has long been rooted in the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws and is a core component of a broker-dealer’s obligations under Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Regulation Best Interest (Reg BI) and FINRA Rule 2111 (Suitability), the fundamental standards that members must meet when recommending securities. This Notice also addresses certain additional obligations for members when selling private placements, including FINRA’s filing requirements and its communications with the public and supervision rules.

This Notice does not create new legal or regulatory requirements or new interpretations of existing requirements, nor does it relieve firms of any existing obligations under federal securities laws and regulations. Members may consider the information in this Notice in developing new, or modifying existing, practices that are reasonably designed to achieve compliance with relevant regulatory obligations based on the member’s size and business model.

FINRA notes that it is issuing a companion notice, Regulatory Notice 23-09, requesting comment on whether changes to FINRA rules, operations or administrative processes would enhance the capital-raising process without compromising protections for investors and issuers. FINRA encourages members to provide feedback pursuant to that Notice.

Per Regulatory Notice 23-09, FINRA promotes the capital raising process through appropriately tailored rules for its members that are designed to promote transparency and to establish important standards of conduct for the benefit of all market participants, including investors and issuers.

In 2017, in Regulatory Notice 17-14, FINRA requested comment on ways to increase efficiency and reduce unnecessary burdens on the capital raising process. Since that time, FINRA has completed certain actions (including rule changes) and is undertaking additional actions, that promote capital formation. While these actions increase efficiency and reduce unnecessary burdens on the capital-raising process, FINRA is requesting comment on whether additional changes to these or other FINRA rules, operations or administrative processes would further enhance the capital-raising process without compromising protections for investors and issuers.

Comment Period Expires: August 7, 2023

Per Regulatory Notice 23-10, FINRA requests comment on a proposal to facilitate centralized access to members’ order execution quality reports for NMS stocks that are required to be published by market centers under Rule 605 of Regulation NMS. Under the proposal, FINRA members would be required to provide their Rule 605 reports to FINRA, which FINRA would publish in a centralized location on the FINRA website.

Comment Period Expires: July 31, 2023

Special Notices

There were no Special Notices in May.

SEC

Final Rules

Per Release No. 34-97424, the SEC is adopting amendments to modernize and improve disclosure about repurchases of an issuer’s equity securities that are registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The amendments require additional detail regarding the structure of an issuer’s repurchase program and its share repurchases, require the filing of daily quantitative repurchase data either quarterly or semi-annually, and eliminate the requirement to file monthly repurchase data in an issuer’s periodic reports. The amendments also revise and expand the existing periodic disclosure requirements about these repurchases. Finally, the amendments add new quarterly disclosure in certain periodic reports related to an issuer’s adoption and termination of certain trading arrangements. This final rule is effective on July 31, 2023.

Per Release No. IA-6297, the SEC is adopting amendments to Form PF, the confidential reporting form for certain SEC-registered investment advisers to private funds to require event reporting upon the occurrence of key events. The amendments also require large private equity fund advisers to provide additional information to the SEC about the private equity funds they advise. The reporting requirements are designed to
enhance the Financial Stability Oversight Council’s (“FSOC”) ability to monitor systemic risk as well as bolster the SEC’s regulatory oversight of private fund advisers and investor protection efforts.

Per Release No. 34-97478, the SEC is making technical amendments to Form BD and Form BDW, the uniform broker-dealer registration form and the uniform request for withdrawal from broker-dealer registration, respectively. The technical amendments will update the current list of self-regulatory organizations (“SROs”) and government jurisdictions listed on Form BD and Form BDW, and make conforming changes to the definition of “jurisdiction” in the forms.

Per Release No. 33-11197, the SEC is adopting technical amendments to various rules and forms under the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”), the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), and the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“Investment Company Act”), as well as to the rule setting forth undertakings that certain registrants must include in their registration statements, and to the general authority provision corresponding to SEC rules under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“Investment Advisers Act”). These revisions make changes to correct errors that are technical in nature, including typographical errors and erroneous cross-references in various SEC rules and
forms.

Proposed Rules

Per Release No. 34-97516, the SEC is proposing to amend certain portions of the Covered Clearing Agency Standards under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) to strengthen the existing rules regarding margin with respect to intraday margin and the use of substantive inputs to a covered clearing agency’s risk-based margin system. The SEC is also proposing a new rule to establish requirements for the contents of a covered clearing agency’s recovery and wind-down plan.

Comments should be received on or before July 17, 2023.

Interim Final Rules

There were no interim final rules in May.

Interpretive Releases

There were no interpretive releases in May.

Policy Statements

There were no policy statements in May.

NFA

Notices to Members

Notice I-23-11

May 24, 2023

FINRA adjusts online testing requirements for candidates seeking to take futures industry proficiency exams

FINRA administers the futures industry proficiency exams on behalf of NFA, including the Series 3, Series 30, Series 31, Series 32 and Series 34. Beginning Friday, June 9, 2023, FINRA will end its interim accommodation process, and only certain individuals will be able to request online administration of these exams. These individuals include:

Those experiencing underlying health conditions or are immunocompromised and at an increased risk for severe illness; or
Those who live more than 150 miles from a test center.

Candidates can visit FINRA's website for more information about proficiency exam administration and how to request available accommodations.

Note that NFA's Swaps Proficiency Requirements are not impacted by this change.

News Releases

May 10, 2023

FINRA and NFA Discuss Crypto Assets at Special Summit

FINRA, NFA Expand MOU to Include Information Sharing, Collaboration

May 10, Washington—FINRA and NFA recently held a special summit focused on crypto assets and agreed to expand their Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to address crypto activities that fall within their respective regulatory mandates.

During the day-long summit held at FINRA's San Francisco office, crypto and blockchain experts from both organizations met to share regulatory intelligence and ways to leverage new technology. FINRA and NFA also discussed the importance of investor protection, as well as potential risks, reporting and supervisory obligations associated with crypto-related activities.

The meeting culminated in an agreement to expand the existing MOU to address information sharing and collaboration regarding crypto assets, blockchain technology developments and crypto asset regulatory risks.

"We are excited to build on our strong relationship with our colleagues at NFA in finding new ways to benefit from one another's deep expertise," said Greg Ruppert, Executive Vice President, Member Supervision at FINRA. "Maintaining effective regulatory partnership and information sharing across various products and asset classes helps each of our organizations better serve the investing public."

"NFA looks forward to collaborating with FINRA as the crypto market continues to evolve," said Regina Thoele, Senior Vice President, Compliance at NFA. "By leveraging our shared expertise, we can continue enhancing our investor protection efforts in light of market developments."

Hot Issue

Off-channel communications continue to be a hot issue with the SEC with the potential for significant enforcement consequences.

Our Perspective

For more information, please contact:

Mitch Avnet

p. (646) 346-2468

mavnet@compliance-risk.com

David Amster

p. (917) 568-6470

damster@compliance-risk.com

Sources:

FINRA May 2023 Industry Notices
SEC Regulatory Actions
SEC Press Release
NFA Notice to Members
NFA Press Releases

The post Monthly Regulatory Summary (May 2023) appeared first on Compliance Risk Concepts.

Monthly Regulatory Summary (April 2023)

CRC — Thu, 11 May 2023 13:16:12 +0000

FINRA

Regulatory Notices

There were no Regulatory Notices in April.

Special Notices

There were no Special Notices in April.

SEC

Final Rules

There were no final rules in April.

Proposed Rules

Per Release No. 34-97309, the SEC is reopening the comment period for its proposal (“Proposed Rules”) to amend the rule under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) that defines certain terms used in the statutory definition of “exchange.” The reopening provides supplemental information and economic analysis regarding trading systems that trade crypto asset securities that would be newly included in the definition of “exchange” under the Proposed Rules. The SEC is requesting further information and public comment on certain aspects of the Proposed Rules as applicable to all securities and the compliance dates and other alternatives for the Proposed Rules. The Proposed Rules were set forth in Release No. 34-94062 (“Proposing Release”), and the related comment period, which was reopened in Release No. 34-94868 on May 9, 2022, ended on June 13, 2022. The reopening of this comment period is intended to allow interested persons further opportunity to analyze and comment on the Proposed Rules in light of the supplemental information provided herein (“Reopening Release”).

Per Release No. 33-11180, the SEC is reopening the comment period for its proposal, Modernization of Beneficial Ownership Reporting, Release No. 33-11030, (Feb. 10, 2022) (“Proposing Release”). In the Proposing Release, the SEC proposed to amend certain rules that govern beneficial ownership reporting (“Proposed Amendments”). The Proposed Amendments would modernize the filing deadlines for initial and amended beneficial ownership reports filed on Schedules 13D and 13G. The Proposed Amendments also would deem holders of certain cash-settled derivative securities as beneficial owners of the reference equity securities and clarify the disclosure requirements of Schedule 13D with respect to derivative securities. In addition, the Proposed Amendments would clarify and affirm the operation of the beneficial ownership reporting rules as applied to two or more persons that form a group under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and provide new exemptions to permit such persons to communicate and consult with each other, jointly engage issuers, and execute certain transactions without being subject to regulation as a group. Finally, the Proposed Amendments would require that Schedules 13D and 13G be filed using a structured, machine-readable data language. The SEC is reopening the comment period to allow interested persons an opportunity to comment on the additional analysis and data contained in a staff memorandum that was added to the public comment file on April 28, 2023.

Interim Final Rules

There were no interim final rules in April.

Interpretive Releases

There were no interpretive releases in April.

Policy Statements

There were no policy statements in April.

NFA

There were no Notices to Members in April.

News Releases

There were no NFA news releases in April.

Hot Issue

Although the initial compliance date for the amended Rule 17a-4 (broker-dealer records rule) came and went on May 3, 2023, the new requirements and options with respect to books and records maintained on electronic recordkeeping systems should be an ongoing consideration for broker-dealers. If you need help evaluating your systems and program for compliance with the new requirements, please contact CRC.

Our Perspective

For more information, please contact:

Mitch Avnet

p. (646) 346-2468

mavnet@compliance-risk.com

David Amster

p. (917) 568-6470

damster@compliance-risk.com

Sources:

SEC Regulatory Actions

The post Monthly Regulatory Summary (April 2023) appeared first on Compliance Risk Concepts.

Monthly Regulatory Summary (January 2023)

CRC — Tue, 07 Feb 2023 17:10:47 +0000

FINRA

Regulatory Notices

Per Notice 23-01, FINRA’s Renewal Program supports the collection and disbursement of fees related to the renewal of broker-dealer (BD) and investment adviser (IA) registrations, exempt reporting and notice filings with participating self-regulatory organizations (SRO) and jurisdictions. During this program, FINRA announces renewal fees BD and IA firms owe via Preliminary Statements issued in November. FINRA publishes Final Statements in January to confirm or reconcile the actual renewal fees BD and IA firms owe after Jan. 1, 2023.

FINRA is issuing this Notice to help firms review, reconcile and respond to their Final Statements in E-Bill as well as view the reports that are currently available in the Central Registration Depository (CRD) and Investment Adviser Registration Depository (IARD) systems for the annual registration renewal process.

The deadline to remit payment for any additional amounts owed and to report any discrepancies to FINRA is Jan. 27, 2023. It is critical that firms ensure they pay in full or report discrepancies by this deadline. More information about reporting discrepancies, as well as key dates, is in the Notice.

Per Notice 23-02, FINRA has adopted amendments to Rule 2231 (Customer Account Statements) to add eight new supplementary materials pertaining to:

compliance with Rule 4311 (Carrying Agreements);
the transmission of customer account statements to other persons or entities;
the use of electronic media to satisfy delivery obligations;
compliance with Rule 3150 (Holding of Customer Mail);
the information disclosed on customer account statements;
assets externally held;
the use of logos and trademarks, etc.; and
the use of summary statements.

Several of these new supplementary materials are derived largely from Temporary Dual FINRA-NYSE Rule 409T (Statements of Accounts to Customers) and Temporary Dual FINRA-NYSE Rule Interpretation 409T (together, the NYSE provisions).

These changes become effective on January 1, 2024.

The amended rule text is available in Attachment A.

Special Notices

There were no special notices in January.

SEC

Final Rules

Per Release No. 33-11143, the SEC is publishing this notice (the “Notice”) pursuant to the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015 (the “2015 Act”). This Act requires all agencies to adjust annually for inflation the civil monetary penalties that can be imposed under the statutes administered by the agency and publish the adjusted amounts in the Federal Register. This Notice sets forth the annual inflation adjustment of the maximum amount of civil monetary penalties (“CMPs”) administered by the Commission under the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and certain penalties under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. These amounts are effective beginning on January 15, 2023, and will apply to all penalties imposed after that date for violations of the aforementioned statutes that occurred after November 2, 2015.

Proposed Rules

Per Release No. 33-11151, the SEC is revising and re-proposing a rule that was initially proposed in September 2011 that would implement a provision under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (“Dodd-Frank Act”) prohibiting an underwriter, placement agent, initial purchaser, or sponsor of an asset-backed security (including a synthetic asset-backed security), or any affiliate or subsidiary of any such entity, from engaging in any transaction that would involve or result in certain material conflicts of interest.

Per Release No. 34-96768, the SEC, with the concurrence of the Office of Government Ethics (“OGE”), is jointly issuing with OGE this proposed rule for Commission members and employees. This proposed rule would amend the existing Supplemental Standards of Ethical Conduct for Members and Employees of the SEC (“Supplemental Standards”) jointly issued by SEC and OGE, would supplement the Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch (OGE Standards) issued by OGE, and is necessary and appropriate to address ethical issues unique to the SEC. The SEC is proposing to revise transaction and reporting requirements for certain assets that pose a low risk of conflicts of interest or appearance concerns, and to prohibit employee ownership of sector funds that have a stated policy of concentrating their investments in entities directly regulated by the SEC. Further, the SEC proposes to authorize collection of covered securities transactions and holdings data from financial institutions through a third-party automated compliance system. The SEC also proposes to correct certain technical matters and adjust its transaction and reporting requirements to provide the flexibility necessary to implement a third-party automated compliance system.

Interim Final Rules

There were no interim final rules in January.

Interpretive Releases

There were no interpretive releases in January.

Policy Statements

There were no policy statements in January.

NFA

Notice I-23-01

January 4, 2023

Notice of Annual Meeting of NFA Members and Board and Nominating Committee Selection

Notice of Annual Meeting

NFA will hold its Annual Meeting of Members on Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 12:00 p.m. (CST), via video conferencing. The agenda of the meeting is:

Opening remarks.
Members' questions regarding NFA-related topics.
Any other business that may properly come before the Annual Meeting (or any adjournment or postponement thereof).

To register for the Annual Meeting of Members, please email your name, NFA ID and contact email to MemberMeeting2023@nfa.futures.org. Registration is due by Tuesday, January 31, 2023. NFA will then provide you with information on accessing the Annual Meeting.

Board and Nominating Committee Election

On November 10, 2022, NFA notified all Members of the candidates that the 2022 Nominating Committee nominated for election to NFA's Board of Directors and 2023 Nominating Committee and advised Members of the procedures by which additional candidates could petition to be nominated for election (NTM I-22-22). No Members have petitioned for nomination of a candidate for election to the Board or Nominating Committee. Accordingly, NFA's Executive Committee, pursuant to Article VII, Section (3)(c) and Article X, Section 3 of NFA's Certificate of Incorporation, will elect the nominees to the Board and Nominating Committee in January 2023.

Notice I-23-02

January 10, 2023

Executive Representative Reminder and Proposed Amendments to NFA's Articles of Incorporation Relating to NFA's Governance

Executive Representative Reminder

As discussed more fully below, NFA's Board of Directors (Board) recently approved unanimously amendments to NFA's Articles of Incorporation (Articles). NFA's Articles require that these amendments be submitted to a vote of the Members and adopted upon the affirmative vote of the majority of those Members that cast a vote in each Member Category—FCM/IB, CPO/CTA, SD/MSP/RFED and Contract Market. NFA utilizes an electronic voting process for Member approval of amendments to NFA's Articles. NFA has engaged Corporate Election Services (CES) to administer the electronic voting process. To facilitate the electronic voting process, CES will send the voting materials to each Member's designated Executive Representative who has the Member's sole authority to sign and complete proxy cards and provide voting instructions and cast votes on behalf of the Member.

If a Member has already designated an Executive Representative, it is not necessary to do so again unless the person designated as the Executive Representative has changed. Any Member that needs to designate or change its Executive Representative should do so through NFA's website by accessing NFA's Executive Representative Contact form found on NFA's Electronic Filing Systems page. Only firm employees who are Security Manager(s) or are authorized to "View, Update, and File" information in ORS may complete this form. Any addition or change must be made by January 16, 2023.

If a Member does not have a designated Executive Representative by January 16, 2023, NFA will deem the Membership Contact listed on the Member's Form 7-R as the Member's Executive Representative, and that person will have the sole authority to cast votes on the Member's behalf. Votes submitted by any person other than the Executive Representative (or the Membership Contact if no Executive Representative is designated) will not be counted.

Notice I-23-03

January 23, 2023

Member obligations under NFA Bylaw 1101 and Compliance Rule 2-36(d) with respect to CPOs/CTAs exempt from registration

The CFTC requires any person that claims an exemption from CPO registration under CFTC Regulation 4.13(a)(1), 4.13(a)(2), 4.13(a)(3), 4.13(a)(5), an exclusion from CPO registration under CFTC Regulation 4.5 or an exemption from CTA registration under 4.14(a)(8) (collectively, exemption) to annually affirm the applicable notice of exemption within 60 days of the calendar year end. Persons that fail to file the affirmation notice by March 1, 2023, will be deemed to have requested a withdrawal of the exemption and, therefore, may be required to be registered and NFA Members.

Since exempt CPOs/CTAs have until March 1, 2023, to complete the affirmation process, NFA recognizes that it may be difficult for a Member to conclusively determine prior to that date whether a previously exempt CPO/CTA continues to be eligible for a current exemption.

Therefore, Members that take reasonable steps to determine the registration and membership status of these previously exempt persons will not be in violation of NFA Bylaw 1101 or Compliance Rule 2-36(d) if, between January 1 and March 31, 2023, they transact customer business with a previously exempt person that fails to become registered and an NFA Member, file a notice affirming its exemption from CPO/CTA registration, or provide a written representation as to why the person is not required to register or file the notice affirming the exemption.

How to identify whether an exempt CPO/CTA has affirmed its exemption

Members should compare their list of exempt CPO/CTAs with which the Member transacts customer business to the information NFA makes available to assist Members in determining whether an exempt CPO/CTA has affirmed its exemption(s).

Members can review exemption information in two ways. Members can view individual persons or entities by navigating to NFA's BASIC System, opening the person or entity's record, and, if applicable, clicking 'View All' in the Firm Exemptions box and/or the Pools & Pool Exemptions box. The Firm Exemptions page and/or the Pools & Pool Exemptions page will reflect an affirmation date if an exempt person or entity has properly filed a notice affirming an exemption, if applicable. Any exemption that was not affirmed in the previous year will no longer appear in BASIC as of March 2, 2023.

Alternatively, Members can access a spreadsheet that includes a list of all persons or entities that have exemptions on file with NFA that must be affirmed on an annual basis. This spreadsheet, which is updated nightly, can be found in the Member's Annual Questionnaire which can be accessed by logging into the system. The spreadsheet includes all persons or entities with an exemption(s) that requires an annual affirmation, as well as the most recent affirmation date, if applicable, and the affirmation due date. If the affirmation due date is March 1, 2023 the exemption has not yet been affirmed. Once the exemption has been affirmed, the affirmation due date will change to February 29, 2024. Any exemptions not affirmed after March 1, 2023, will be withdrawn.

Expectations for Members transacting customer business with an exempt CPO/CTA that has not affirmed its exemption

NFA expects any Member transacting customer business with a person that previously claimed an exemption from CPO/CTA registration under the regulations listed above, and that has not filed a notice in NFA's Exemption System affirming the exemption, not filed a notice of exemption for another available exemption, or not properly registered and become an NFA Member by December 31, 2022, to promptly contact the person to determine whether the person intends to file a notice affirming the exemption.

If the Member learns that the person does not intend to file a notice affirming the exemption, or the person does not file a notice affirming the exemption by March 1, 2023, then the Member must promptly obtain a written representation as to why the person is not required to register or file a notice of exemption and evaluate whether the representation appears adequate. If the Member determines that this written representation is inadequate and the person is required to be registered, then the Member must put a plan in place (e.g., liquidation-only trades) to cease transacting customer business with the person or risk violating NFA Bylaw 1101 or Compliance Rule 2-36(d).

Any Member that acts in accordance with the information provided in this Notice will not be charged with violating NFA Bylaw 1101 or Compliance Rule 2-36(d). Members should be aware, however, that this Notice does not relieve their regulatory obligations pursuant to the Commodity Exchange Act and the CFTC's Regulations.

News Releases

January 12, 2023

NFA orders Chicago, IL swap dealer StoneX Markets LLC to pay a $1,000,000 fine

NFA has ordered Chicago, Illinois swap dealer Member StoneX Markets LLC (Stone) to pay a $1,000,000 fine.

The Decision, issued by NFA's Business Conduct Committee (BCC), is based on a Complaint issued by the BCC and a settlement offer submitted by Stone. In the settlement offer, the firm neither admitted nor denied the allegations in the Complaint.

In its Decision, the BCC found that Stone violated NFA Compliance Rule 2-4 by failing to provide timely and complete disclosure to its counterparties that the firm was not calculating initial margin (IM) according to its customary procedures; violated NFA Compliance Rule 2-49(a) by failing to maintain and enforce an adequate risk management program with respect to the firm's value-at-risk calculation and daily IM determination, and by failing to retain required records and provide pre-trade mid-market marks to counterparties; and violated NFA Compliance Rules 2-9(d) and 2-49(a) by failing to supervise the firm's operations.

The complete text of the Complaint and Decision can be viewed on NFA's website.

Hot Issues

In January, the 2023 Report on FINRA’s Examination and Risk Monitoring Program was published. This year’s report addresses a materially broader range of topics than in prior years particularly in the Market Integrity section). Additionally, the report introduces a new Financial Crimes section, consisting of three topics—Anti-Money Laundering (AML), Fraud and Sanctions; Cybersecurity and Technological Governance; and Manipulative Trading. The report also identifies several emerging risks: Manipulative Trading in Small Cap IPOs, Sanctions Evasion, ACATS Fraud, and Senior Investors and Financial Crime.

Our Perspective

For more information, please contact:

Mitch Avnet

p. (646) 346-2468

mavnet@compliance-risk.com

David Amster

p. (917) 568-6470

damster@compliance-risk.com

Sources:

FINRA January 2023 Industry Notices
SEC Regulatory Actions
NFA Notice to Members
NFA Press Releases
2023 Report on FINRA’s Examination and Risk Monitoring Program

The post Monthly Regulatory Summary (January 2023) appeared first on Compliance Risk Concepts.

Considerations for FINRA Membership involving Digital Asset Securities

CRC — Fri, 27 Jan 2023 15:01:42 +0000

In November 2022, FINRA published a podcast that discussed available guidance concerning several paths through which broker-dealers can be approved by FINRA for digital asset securities activity: 1) as a placement agent in private placement digital asset securities offerings, 2) as an ATS facilitating secondary transaction of digital asset securities, and 3) as a special purpose broker-dealer (SPBD) with custody of digital asset securities.

1) Placement agent in private placement digital asset securities offerings

Overview

The broker-dealer sends the trade-matching details (e.g., identity of the parties, price, and quantity) to the buyer and issuer of a digital asset security—like a traditional private placement—and the issuer settles the transaction bilaterally between the buyer and issuer, away from the broker-dealer. In this case, the broker-dealer instructs the customer to pay the issuer directly and instructs the issuer to issue the digital asset security to the customer directly (e.g., the customer’s “digital wallet”).

Everything happens away from the broker-dealer so it does not custody the digital asset. The broker-dealer does not handle, control, or receive customer funds or securities. Issuers and investors directly transact with each other through an escrow account established by issuer.

Key Considerations in a Placement Agent Application

Demonstrate an understanding of the risks of the digital asset security.
Communicate how the risks will be disclosed and how the offering documents will be reviewed.
Evidence an understanding of the obligations under FINRA’s advertising rules (including if first-year firm conditions apply).
Detail the role and function of the broker-dealer with specificity.
Be able to show that that there are procedures that are specific to digital asset securities and the distributed ledger.

2) ATS facilitating secondary transaction of digital asset securities (two types)

ATS #1: Bilateral settlement without ATS involvement

Overview

The ATS matches the orders of buyers and sellers of digital asset securities, and the trades are either settled directly between the buyer and seller or the buyer and seller give instructions to their respective custodians to settle the transactions. In either case, a broker-dealer operator does not guarantee or otherwise have responsibility for settling the trades and does not at any time exercise any level of control over the digital asset securities being sold or the cash being used to make the purchase (e.g., the ATS does not place a temporary hold on the seller’s wallet or on the buyer’s cash to ensure the transaction is completed).

Step 1 - the buyer and seller send their respective orders to the ATS;
Step 2 - the ATS matches the orders;
Step 3 - the ATS notifies the buyer and seller of the matched trade; and
Step 4 - the buyer and seller settle the transaction bilaterally, either directly with each other or by instructing their respective custodians to settle the transaction on their behalf.

ATS #2: Custodians carry out conditional instructions using information from ATS

Overview

In this case, there is a higher degree of control exercised by the broker-dealer operator because it tells the buyer’s custodian where to send the funds and the seller’s custodian where to deliver the securities. As with the four-step process, the broker-dealer operator does not guarantee or otherwise have responsibility for settling the trades and does not at any time exercise any level of control over the digital asset securities being sold or the cash being used to make the purchase (e.g., the ATS does not place a temporary hold on the seller’s wallet or on the buyer’s cash to ensure the transaction is completed) but it notifies the custodians for the buyer and seller, and the buyer and seller, of the match.

Step 1 - the buyer and seller send their respective orders to the ATS, notify their respective custodians of their respective orders submitted to the ATS, and instruct their respective custodians to settle transactions in accordance with the terms of their orders when the ATS notifies the custodians of a match on the ATS;
- Step 2 - the ATS matches the orders; and
- Step 3 - the ATS notifies the buyer and seller and their respective custodians of the matched trade and the custodians carry out the conditional instructions.

Key Considerations in ATS Applications

Explain in detail how the transaction flows and business model involving digital asset securities and the ATS comply with either the three-step or the four-step process.
Ensure other documents are consistent with that process, such as:
1. User disclosure
1. Draft Form ATS
1. Contracts
1. Custodian disclosure
1. Disclosures with other third-parties

3) Special Purpose Broker-Dealer (SPBD) with Custody of Digital Asset Securities

Overview

The business activities of a special purpose broker-dealer are limited to digital assets that are also securities (this can include operation of an ATS that trades only in digital assets securities or otherwise engages in other business involving digital assets securities). It cannot engage in business activities involving non-security digital assets or securities that are not digital assets (e.g., traditional securities).

Key Considerations in SPBD Applications

Demonstrate an understanding how the business model is impacted by the nine conditions detailed in the SEC Statement (dated April 27, 2021).
Explain how each of the nine conditions are met.
Make it clear where staff can find information responsive to each of the nine conditions.

Lastly, the FINRA podcast also identified several common issues with membership applications involving digital asset securities.

Show that the applicant is capable of complying with FINRA rules and the U.S. federal securities laws and regulations.
Missing details. For example:
- What is the business plan?
- What is the relationship between different parts of the broker-dealer’s business?
- How does the transaction flow and business model involving digital asset securities fit with the available guidance?
- How will the broker-dealer ensure that it functions in a way comporting with the applicable guidance?
- How do the transaction flows address compliance and legal requirements?
- Is there documentation to support that each step in the transaction flow meets those requirements?
Being inconsistent in describing the proposed business activities involving digital assets, cryptocurrencies, distributed ledger or related products.

CRC has extensive experience with helping firms successfully navigate the New Member and Continuing Member Application process with FINRA. We are specifically familiar with the fintech space and offer clients the ability to quickly scale and support their application with experienced C-Suite level personnel. Contact us today to discuss how we can provide right-sized support as you consider forming a broker-dealer.

For more information, please contact:

Mitch Avnet

p. (646) 346-2468

mavnet@compliance-risk.com

David Amster

p. (917) 568-6470

damster@compliance-risk.com

The post Considerations for FINRA Membership involving Digital Asset Securities appeared first on Compliance Risk Concepts.

Monthly Regulatory Summary (December 2022)

CRC — Thu, 19 Jan 2023 15:36:42 +0000

FINRA

Regulatory Notices

Per Notice 22-27, FINRA has adopted amendments to Rule 6730 (Transaction Reporting) to (i) require members to report transactions in U.S. Treasury securities to FINRA’s Trade Reporting and Compliance Engine (TRACE) as soon as practicable but no later than 60 minutes from the time of execution; and (ii) require members to report electronically executed transactions in U.S. Treasury securities to TRACE in the finest increment captured by the system used to execute the transaction, subject to an exception for members with limited trading volume in U.S. Treasury securities. FINRA is also revising its TRACE Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) to standardize price reporting for Treasury bills and Floating Rate Notes (FRNs) by requiring all transactions to be reported using the dollar price.

The amendments to reduce the trade reporting timeframe for transactions in U.S. Treasury securities will take effect on May 15, 2023. The amendments related to the granularity of execution timestamps, as well as the revisions to the TRACE FAQs to standardize price reporting, will take effect on November 6, 2023.

The amended text of Rule 6730 is set forth in Attachment A.

Per Notice 22-28, FINRA has adopted amendments to the Rule 6700 series (Trade Reporting and Compliance Engine (TRACE)) to require members to report to TRACE transactions in U.S. dollar-denominated foreign sovereign debt securities. The amendments will take effect on November 6, 2023.

The amended rule text is available in the online FINRA Manual.

Per Notice 22-29, FINRA has received reports about increasing numbers and sophistication of ransomware incidents. Ransomware typically involves bad actors gaining unauthorized access to firm systems and encrypting or otherwise accessing sensitive firm data or customer information, then holding that hijacked data for ransom. Some ransomware attacks have become significant threats that include theft of data and bad actors’ ongoing network access.

Ransomware attacks have proliferated due to, in part, increased use of technology and continued adoption of cryptocurrencies, which bad actors use to hide their identities when collecting ransom payments. Further, Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) models, where bad actors purchase attack services on the dark web, have helped execute attacks on a much larger scale and make attacks available to less technologically savvy bad actors.

Rule 30 of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Regulation S-P requires firms to have written policies and procedures that are reasonably designed to safeguard customer records and information. FINRA Rule 4370 (Business Continuity Plans and Emergency Contact Information) also applies to ransomware attacks that include denials of service and other interruptions to members’ operations.

This Notice provides questions firms can use to evaluate their cybersecurity programs in light ofthe increased ransomware threat, lists possible additional firm controls and provides relevant resources.

This Notice, including the questions for consideration, does not create new legal or regulatory requirements or new interpretations of existing requirements, nor does it relieve firms of any existing obligations under federal securities laws and regulations. Member firms may consider the information in this Notice in developing new, or modifying existing, practices that are reasonably designed to achieve compliance with relevant regulatory obligations based on the member firm’s size and business model. Moreover, some questions may not be relevant due to certain firms’ business models, size or practices.

Per Notice 22-30, FINRA is issuing this Notice to re-open the comment period for Regulatory Notice 15-13. Rule 15b9-1 currently provides proprietary trading firms with an exemption from membership in a national securities association. If the SEC re-proposal is adopted, the amendments generally would require a proprietary trading firm relying on the current exemption to register with FINRA if the firm continues to effect transactions other than on an exchange of which it is a member, with limited exceptions. FINRA membership would, among other things, apply FINRA’s existing fee structure to these firms, including FINRA’s Trading Activity Fee. FINRA is re-opening the comment period for Regulatory Notice 15-13, which had previously proposed an exemption to exclude from FINRA’s Trading Activity Fee transactions by a proprietary trading firm on exchanges of which the firm is a member.

Per Notice 22-31, member firms are required to make reasonable efforts to obtain the name of and contact information for a trusted contact for a non-institutional customer’s account. This Notice summarizes member firms’ regulatory obligations, discusses the benefits of trusted contacts in administering customers’ accounts, highlights customer education resources and shares effective practices member firms use.

This Notice does not create new legal or regulatory requirements or new interpretations of existing requirements, nor does it relieve firms of any existing obligations under federal securities laws and regulations. Member firms may consider the information in this Notice in developing new, or modifying existing, practices that are reasonably designed to achieve compliance with relevant regulatory obligations based on the member firm’s size and business model.

Special Notices

There were no special notices in November.

SEC

Final Rules

Per Release No. 33-11138, the SEC is adopting amendments to the rule under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) that provides affirmative defenses to trading on the basis of material nonpublic information in insider trading cases. The amendments add new conditions to this rule that are designed to address concerns about abuse of the rule to trade securities opportunistically on the basis of material nonpublic information in ways that harm investors and undermine the integrity of the securities markets. The SEC is also adopting new disclosure requirements regarding the insider trading policies and procedures of issuers, the adoption and termination (including modification) of plans that are intended to meet the rule’s conditions for establishing an affirmative defense, and certain other similar trading arrangements by directors and officers. In addition, the SEC is adopting amendments to the disclosure requirements for director and executive compensation regarding equity compensation awards made close in time to the issuer’s disclosure of material nonpublic information. Finally, the SEC is adopting amendments to Forms 4 and 5 to require filers to identify transactions made pursuant to a plan intended to meet the rule’s conditions for establishing an affirmative defense and to require disclosure of bona fide gifts of securities on Form 4.

Per Release No. 33-11139, the SEC is adopting technical amendments to its regulations regarding organization, conduct and ethics; and information requests. The technical amendments move the citations of statutory authority for the regulations from the subpart level to the part level and amend related citations to remove duplicative statutory citations at the subpart level.

Per Release No. 33-11140, the SEC is adopting amendments to Volumes I and II of the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval system (“EDGAR”) Filer Manual (“Filer Manual”) and related rules and forms. EDGAR Releases 22.4 and 22.4.1 will be deployed in the EDGAR system on or about December 19, 2022, and January 3, 2023, respectively.

Proposed Rules

Per Release No. 34-96458, the SEC is reopening the comment period for its proposal, Share Repurchase Disclosure Modernization, Exchange Act Release No. 34-93783 (Dec. 15, 2021) (“Proposing Release”). The SEC proposed amendments to modernize and improve disclosure about repurchases of an issuer’s equity securities that are registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Specifically, the proposed amendments would require an issuer to provide more timely disclosure on a new Form SR regarding purchases of its equity securities for each day that it, or an affiliated purchaser, makes a share repurchase. The proposed amendments would also enhance the existing periodic disclosure requirements about these purchases. The SEC subsequently reopened the comment period for the Proposing Release in Resubmission of Comments and Reopening of Comment Periods for Several Rulemaking Releases Due to a Technological Error in Receiving Certain Comments, Exchange Act Release No. 34-96005 (Oct. 7, 2022). In addition, after the proposed amendments were published for public comment, an excise tax on share repurchases was signed into law. A staff memorandum was added to the public comment file on December 7, 2022 to analyze the impact of the new excise tax on the potential economic effects of the proposed amendments. The SEC is reopening the comment period to allow interested persons the opportunity to analyze and comment on the additional analysis.

Per Release No. 34-96493, the SEC is proposing to amend existing requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) to update the disclosure required for order executions in national market system (“NMS”) stocks. First, the SEC is proposing to expand the scope of reporting entities subject to the rule that requires market centers to make available to the public monthly execution quality reports to encompass broker-dealers with a larger number of customers. Next, the SEC is proposing to modify the definition of “covered order” to include certain orders submitted outside of regular trading hours and certain orders submitted with stop prices. In addition, the SEC is proposing modifications to the information required to be reported under the rule, including changing how orders are categorized by order size as well as how they are categorized by order type. As part of the changes to these categories, the SEC is proposing to capture execution quality information for fractional share orders, odd-lot orders, and larger-sized orders. Additionally, the SEC is proposing to modify reporting requirements for non-marketable limit orders (“NMLOs”) in order to capture more relevant execution quality information for these orders by requiring statistics to be reported from the time such orders become executable. The SEC is also proposing to eliminate time-to-execution categories in favor of average time-to-execution, the median time-to-execution, and 99th percentile time-to-execution, each as measured in increments of a millisecond or finer and calculated on a share-weighted basis. In order to better reflect the speed of the marketplace, the SEC is proposing that the time of order receipt and time of order execution be measured in increments of a millisecond or finer and that realized spread be calculated at both 15 seconds and one minute. Finally, the SEC is proposing to enhance the accessibility of the required reports by requiring all reporting entities to make a summary report available.

Per Release No. 34-96494, the SEC is proposing to amend certain rules of Regulation National Market System (“Regulation NMS”) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”) to adopt variable minimum pricing increments for the quoting and trading of NMS stocks, reduce the access fee caps, and enhance the transparency of better-priced orders.

Per Release No. 34-96495, the SEC is proposing to amend the regulation governing the national market system (“NMS”) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) to add a new rule designed to promote competition as a means to protect the interests of individual investors and to further the objectives of an NMS. The proposed rule would prohibit a restricted competition trading center from internally executing certain orders of individual investors at a price unless the orders are first exposed to competition at that price in a qualified auction operated by an open competition trading center. The proposed rule would also include limited exceptions to this general prohibition. In addition, the SEC is proposing to amend the regulation governing the NMS to add new defined terms included in the proposed rule.

Per Release No. 34-96496, the SEC is proposing new rules under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) relating to a broker-dealer’s duty of best execution. Proposed Regulation Best Execution would enhance the existing regulatory framework concerning the duty of best execution by requiring detailed policies and procedures for all broker-dealers and more robust policies and procedures for broker-dealers engaging in certain conflicted transactions with retail customers, as well as related review and documentation requirements.

Interim Final Rules

There were no interim final rules in December.

Interpretive Releases

There were no interpretive releases in December.

Policy Statements

There were no policy statements in December.

NFA

Notice I-22-24

December 1, 2022

FINRA announces increase in proficiency examination fees for 2023

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) notified NFA that it will increase its fees for the administration and delivery of NFA's qualifications examinations on January 1, 2023.

On this date, the fee for an individual to take the Series 3: National Commodity Futures Examination will be $140, an increase of $10. The fee for the Series 30: NFA Branch Manager Examination; Series 31: Futures Managed Funds Examination; Series 32: Limited Futures Examination–Regulations; and Series 34: Retail Off-Exchange Forex Examination will be $90, a $5 increase.

To sign up for any of these examinations, an applicant must apply online by visiting FINRA's website.

For information on proficiency requirements, including study outlines, visit NFA's proficiency requirements webpage.

Notice I-22-25

December 5, 2022

Guidance on the annual affirmation requirement for entities currently operating under an exemption from CPO or CTA registration

The CFTC requires any person that claims an exemption from CPO registration under CFTC Regulation 4.13(a)(1), 4.13(a)(2), 4.13(a)(3), 4.13(a)(5), an exclusion from CPO registration under CFTC Regulation 4.5 or an exemption from CTA registration under 4.14(a)(8) (collectively, exemption) to annually affirm the applicable notice of exemption within 60 days of the calendar year-end, which is March 1, 2023, for this affirmation cycle.

Persons re-affirming an exemption under 4.13(a)(1), 4.13(a)(2), 4.13(a)(3) and 4.13(a)(5) will be required to attest that neither the person nor its principals has in its background any statutory disqualifications listed under Section 8a(2) of the Commodity Exchange Act.

Failure to affirm an active exemption from CPO or CTA registration will result in the exemption being withdrawn on March 2, 2023. For registered CPOs or CTAs, withdrawal of the exemption will result in the entity being subject to Part 4 Requirements regardless of whether the entity otherwise remains eligible for the exemption. For non-registrants, the withdrawal of the exemption may subject the person or entity to enforcement action by the CFTC, if either continues to operate without registration or exemption.

How to complete the affirmation process

To complete the affirmation process, access the Exemptions System from the Electronic Filing Systems page on NFA's website.

The Notice also includes frequently asked questions about exemptions.

Notice I-22-26

December 12, 2022

FCM and RFED filing requirements for Christmas and New Year's Day—Reminder for upcoming holidays

This is a reminder that the following futures commission merchant (FCM) and retail foreign exchange dealer (RFED) regulatory filings will be impacted as follows by the Christmas and New Year's Day holidays:

Christmas Day (Observed)—Monday, December 26, 2022

• Daily segregated, 30.7 secured, cleared swaps customer collateral and daily forex statements prepared as of Friday, December 23, 2022, are required to be submitted by 12:00 noon on Tuesday, December 27, 2022; and

• Daily segregated, 30.7 secured, cleared swaps customer collateral and daily forex statements are required to be prepared as of Monday, December 26, 2022, and are required to be submitted by 12:00 noon on Tuesday, December 27, 2022.

New Year's Day (Observed)—Monday, January 2, 2023

• Daily segregated, 30.7 secured, cleared swaps customer collateral and daily forex statements prepared as of Friday, December 30, 2022, are required to be submitted by 12:00 noon on Tuesday, January 3, 2023;

• Daily segregated, 30.7 secured, and cleared swaps customer collateral statements are not required to be prepared as of Monday, January 2, 2023; and

• Daily forex statements are required to be prepared as of Monday, January 2, 2023, and are required to be submitted by 12:00 noon on Tuesday, January 3, 2023.

Any information filed by FCMs or RFEDs after its due date must be accompanied by a fee for each business day that it is late.

Holiday Filing Schedule

Visit NFA's website to view a complete schedule of daily filing requirements for upcoming holidays and an updated calendar of Segregated Investment Detail Report (SIDR) due dates. NFA recommends viewing the calendars and keeping this Notice as a reference for the upcoming 2023 holiday filing requirements.

For more information about filing financial reports, visit NFA's website.

Notice I-22-27

December 12, 2022

SD holiday filing requirements

Visit NFA's website to view schedules of 2023 swap dealer (SD) holiday filings, risk data and margin monitoring filings and financial reporting due dates. We recommend viewing the schedules and keeping this Notice as a reference for the upcoming 2023 holiday filing requirements.

For more information about SD filing requirements visit NFA's website.

News Releases

December 8, 2022

NFA orders Warren, NJ retail forex dealer and futures commission merchant Gain Capital Group LLC to pay a $700,000 fine

December 8, Chicago—NFA has ordered Gain Capital Group LLC (Gain) to pay a $700,000 fine. Gain, which does business as FOREX.com, is a registered retail forex dealer and futures commission merchant Member of NFA headquartered in Warren, New Jersey.

The Decision, issued by NFA's Business Conduct Committee (BCC), is based on a Complaint issued by the BCC and a settlement offer submitted by Gain and Alexander Robert Bobinski, Jr. (Bobinski), an associated person and principal of the firm and Associate Member of NFA. In the settlement offer, the firm and Bobinski neither admitted nor denied the allegations in the Complaint.

In its Decision, the BCC found that Gain violated NFA Compliance Rule 2-43(a)(1) by improperly adjusting customer accounts following a system malfunction; violated NFA Compliance Rule 2-36(c) by its treatment of customers affected by the system malfunction and Gain's account adjustments; violated NFA Compliance Rules 2-5 and 2-36(c) by submitting inaccurate and incomplete information to NFA; and violated NFA Compliance Rules 2-36(e) and 2-9(a) by failing to supervise. The BCC also found that Bobinski violated NFA Compliance Rule 2-36(e) by failing to supervise.

The complete text of the Complaint and Decision can be viewed on NFA's website.

Hot Issues

Advertising & Solicitation

The SEC’s new marketing rule went into full compliance effect in November. The single rule draws from and replaces the previous advertising and cash solicitation rules, Rule 206(4)-1 and Rule 206(4)-3, respectively. The new rule is designed to comprehensively and efficiently regulate advisers’ marketing communications. The new rule also made related amendments to Form ADV, the investment adviser registration form, and Rule 204-2, the books and records rule.

Please reach out today to find out how CRC resources and expertise can be leveraged to support a comprehensive review your compliance programs related to marketing as well as assess existing communications.

Archiving Electronic Communications

In September, the SEC fined 16 firms with penalties totaling over $1.1B due to archiving failures related to electronic communications. Under specific scrutiny is personnel use of texting on personal devices for business-related communications and the use of messaging applications, such as WhatsApp. CRC advises that firms review and address policies and procedures related to the use of personal mobile devices, texting, and other electronic channels to communicate for business purposes. Firms should carefully consider what is permitted under its policies, how such policies are enforced and confirmed, and whether additional solutions need to be built out to ensure appropriate archiving and oversight of such communications.

Our Perspective

For more information, please contact:

Mitch Avnet

p. (646) 346-2468

mavnet@compliance-risk.com

David Amster

p. (917) 568-6470

damster@compliance-risk.com

Sources:

• FINRA December 2022 Industry Notices

• SEC Regulatory Actions

• NFA Notice to Members

• NFA Press Releases

The post Monthly Regulatory Summary (December 2022) appeared first on Compliance Risk Concepts.

Monthly Regulatory Summary (September 2022)

CRC — Tue, 11 Oct 2022 16:50:42 +0000

FINRA

Regulatory Notices

Per Notice 22-20, the NAC has revised FINRA’s Sanction Guidelines, which guide FINRA adjudicators in developing remedial sanctions for violations of the securities rules. These revisions were based on a review to ensure that the guidelines accurately reflect the levels of sanctions imposed in FINRA disciplinary proceedings. The revisions tailor sanctions to differentiate between types of respondents and modify the Sanction Guidelines in the following ways:

• split each current guideline into separate guidelines for individuals and firms;

• create separate fine ranges for small and mid-size or large-size firms;

• remove the upper limit of the fine ranges for mid-size and large-size firms for select guidelines;

• create Anti-Money Laundering guidelines;

• add additional discussion of non-monetary sanctions for firms;

• introduce single fine ranges for all actions in the Quality of Markets guidelines and other select guidelines;

• establish $5,000 as the minimum low end for all firm fine ranges; and delete select guidelines.

The revised Sanction Guidelines are effective immediately and available on FINRA’s website.

Special Notices

There were no special notices in September.

SEC

Final Rules

Per Release No. 33-11098, the SEC is adopting amendments to adjust the thresholds in the definition of “emerging growth company” as well as dollar amounts in Regulation Crowdfundingto effectuate inflation adjustments required under Title I and Title III of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (“JOBS Act”).

Per Release No. 33-11101, the SEC is adopting amendments to Volume II of the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval system (“EDGAR”) Filer Manual and related rules and forms. The EDGAR system was upgraded on September 19, 2022.

Proposed Rules

Per Release No. 34-95763, the SEC is proposing to amend the standards applicable to covered clearing agencies for U.S. Treasury securities to require that such covered clearing agencies have written policies and procedures reasonably designed to require that every direct participant of the covered clearing agency submit for clearance and settlement all eligible secondary market transactions in U.S. Treasury securities to which it is a counterparty. In addition, the SEC is proposing additional amendments to the Covered Clearing Agency Standards, with respect to risk management. These requirements are designed to protect investors, reduce risk, and increase operational efficiency. Finally, the SEC is proposing to amend the broker-dealer customer protection rule to permit margin required and on deposit with covered clearing agencies for U.S. Treasury securities to be included as a debit in the reserve formulas for accounts of customers and proprietary accounts of broker-dealers (“PAB”), subject to certain conditions.

Interim Final Rules

There were no interim final rules in September.

Interpretive Releases

There were no interpretive releases in September.

Policy Statements

There were no policy statements in September.

NFA

Notices to Members

Notice I-22-19

September 26, 2022

Executive Representative Reminder and Board and Nominating Committee Members Whose Terms Will Expire at the Board's 2023 Regular Annual Meeting

Executive Representative Reminder

NFA utilizes an electronic voting process, administered by a third-party service provider, for contested Board Director elections, contested Nominating Committee member elections and approval votes for amendments to NFA's Articles of Incorporation. To facilitate the voting process, NFA requires each Member to designate an individual to act as the Member's Executive Representative, who has the sole authority on behalf of the Member to sign petitions to nominate candidates for Director or Nominating Committee positions, receive notices of Member meetings and proxy materials, complete proxy cards and provide voting instructions and cast votes on behalf of the Member. Members designate an Executive Representative through NFA's website by completing the Executive Representative Contact Form. Only firm personnel who are Security Manager(s) or are authorized to "view, update and file" information in ORS may complete this form.

If a Member fails to designate an Executive Representative by completing this form, NFA will deem the Member's membership contact listed in ORS as the Member's Executive Representative. Members that have already designated an Executive Representative are not required to again complete this form unless the information on the Executive Representative has changed.

Board and Nominating Committee Members' Terms to Expire at 2023 Board of Directors' Regular Annual Meeting

Before October 15th of each year, NFA’s Secretary shall notify all Members in the Futures Commission Merchant (FCM), Introducing Broker (IB), Commodity Pool Operator and Commodity Trading Advisor (CPO/CTA) and Swap Dealer, Major Swap Participant and Retail Foreign Exchange Dealer (SD/MSP/RFED) categories of the elected Directors and the members of the Nominating Committee whose terms shall expire at the Board of Directors' regular annual meeting and shall request that the names of eligible persons to fill those positions be submitted to the Nominating Committee.

The Notice provides a list of the FCM, IB, CPO/CTA and SD/MSP/RFED Board and Nominating Committee members whose terms shall expire at the Board of Directors' regular annual meeting on February 16, 2023. Please use the form provided in the Notice to submit names of persons eligible to fill the vacancies on the Board of Directors and the Nominating Committee. For your reference, an explanation of the composition of the Board of Directors and the Nominating Committee is provided in the Notice. The Nominating Committee shall consider names that are submitted and the membership will be notified of the Committee's nominations. Thereafter, additional nominations may be made by petition pursuant to NFA's Articles. The procedure for filing a nomination by petition will be contained in a subsequent Notice to Members announcing the Nominating Committee's nominations to fill the Board and Nominating Committee vacancies.

News Releases

September 06, 2022

NFA orders Denmark firm Direct Hedge Danmark Fondsmaeglerselskab AS to pay a $70,000 fine

September 6, Chicago—NFA has ordered Direct Hedge Danmark Fondsmaeglerselskab AS(Direct Hedge) to pay a $70,000 fine. Direct Hedge is a registered introducing broker and approved swap firm Member of NFA located in Hellerup, Denmark.

The Decision, issued by an NFA Hearing Panel, is based on a Complaint issued by NFA's Business Conduct Committee and a settlement offer submitted by Direct Hedge, in which the firm neither admitted nor denied the allegations in the Complaint. The Complaint alleged that Direct Hedge failed to keep required communications records, in violation of NFA Compliance Rule 2-10(a) and failed to register an individual as an AP and NFA Associate, in violation of NFA Bylaw 301(b). The Complaint further alleged that Direct Hedge failed to diligently supervise the firm and its employees, in violation of NFA Compliance Rule 2-9(a).

In its Decision, the Hearing Panel found that Direct Hedge violated NFA Compliance Rules 2-9(a) and 2-10(a) and NFA Bylaw 301(b).

The complete text of the Complaint and Decision can be viewed on NFA's website.

Hot Issues

Advertising & Solicitation

The compliance deadline for the SEC’s new marketing rule is approximately one month away. The single rule that draws from and replaces the previous advertising and cash solicitation rules, Rule 206(4)-1 and Rule 206(4)-3, respectively. The new rule is designed to comprehensively and efficiently regulate advisers’ marketing communications. The new rule also made related amendments to Form ADV, the investment adviser registration form, and Rule 204-2, the books and records rule. The compliance date with the new rule is November 4, 2022.

Investment advisers are encouraged to conduct a comprehensive review their compliance programs related to marketing as well as assess existing communications in advance of the compliance date. Please reach out today to find out how CRC resources and expertise can be leveraged to support your reviews.

Archiving Electronic Communications

The SEC recently fined 16 firms, with penalties totaling over $1.1B due to archiving failures related to electronic communications. Under specific scrutiny is personnel use of texting on personal devices for business related communications and the use of messaging applications, such as WhatsApp. CRC advises that firms review and address policies and procedures related to the use of personal mobile devices, texting, and other electronic channels to communicate for business purposes. Firms should carefully consider what is permitted under its policies, how such policies are enforced and confirmed, and whether additional solutions need to be built out to ensure appropriate archiving and oversight of such communications.

Our Perspective

For more information, please contact:

Mitch Avnet

p. (646) 346-2468

mavnet@compliance-risk.com

David Amster

p. (917) 568-6470

damster@compliance-risk.com

Sources:

• FINRA September 2022 Industry Notices

• SEC Regulatory Actions

• NFA Notice to Members

• NFA Press Releases

The post Monthly Regulatory Summary (September 2022) appeared first on Compliance Risk Concepts.

Monthly Regulatory Summary (August 2022)

CRC — Tue, 06 Sep 2022 13:37:17 +0000

FINRA

Regulatory Notices

Per Notice 22-17, FINRA is soliciting comment on a proposal to amend Rule 6730 to reduce the Trade Reporting and Compliance Engine (TRACE) trade reporting timeframe for transactions in all TRACE-Eligible Securities that currently are subject to a 15-minute reporting timeframe. Specifically, members would be required to submit a report to TRACE as soon as practicable (as is currently the case), but no later than one minute from the time of execution, for transactions in corporate bonds, agency debt securities, asset-backed securities and agency pass-through mortgage-backed securities traded to-be-announced for good delivery. As is the case today, FINRA would make information on the reported transactions publicly available immediately upon receipt of the trade report.

Per Notice 22-18, FINRA has received an increasing number of reports regarding registered representatives and associated persons (representatives) forging or falsifying customer signatures, and in some cases signatures of colleagues or supervisors, through third-party digital signature platforms. Firms have, for example, identified signature issues involving a wide range of forms, including account opening documents and updates, account activity letters, discretionary trading authorizations, wire instructions and internal firm documents related to the review of customer transactions.

These types of incidents underscore the need for member firms that allow digital signatures to have adequate controls to detect possible instances of signature forgery or falsification.

To help firms address the risks these signature forgeries and falsifications present, FINRA is sharing information in this Notice about:

relevant regulatory obligations;
forgery and falsification scenarios firms have reported to FINRA; and
methods firms have used to identify those scenarios.

Per Notice 22-19, the NSCC administers ACATS, a system that automates and imposes specified duties and performance timeframes to facilitate the transfer of accounts, in whole or in part, from one firm to another. The NSCC recently announced a change to ACATS that will allow a receiving member (the firm slated to receive the customer’s account) to use the “receiver delete” function to remove alternative investments from an ACATS transfer.

This Notice reminds members of their obligations under FINRA Rule 11870 (Customer Account Transfer Contracts), including that:

members must expedite and coordinate their activities when a customer gives authorized instructions to transfer securities account assets;
notwithstanding the availability of the receiver delete function, a member may not remove an asset from an ACATS transfer unless the member has determined that the asset is a “nontransferable asset” as defined in Rule 11870; and
a receiving member that uses the receiver delete function to remove certain nontransferable assets from an ACATS transfer is required to provide the customer with a list of the nontransferable assets and request in writing, and prior to the time it designates the assets as nontransferable, instructions from the customer with respect to the disposition of the assets.

Special Notices

There were no special notices in August.

SEC

Final Rules

Per Release No. 34-95607, the SEC is adopting amendments to implement Section 14(i) (“Section 14(i)”) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), as added by Section 953(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank Act”). Section 14(i) directs the SEC to adopt rules requiring registrants to provide disclosure of pay versus performance. The disclosure is required in proxy or information statements in which executive compensation disclosure is required. The disclosure requirements do not apply to emerging growth companies, registered investment companies, or foreign private issuers.

Per Release No. 34-95620, the SEC is adopting amendments to the SEC’s rules implementing its whistleblower program. Section 21F of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and the SEC’s implementing rules provide that the SEC shall pay an award to eligible whistleblowers who voluntarily provide the SEC with original information about a violation of the federal securities laws that leads to the successful enforcement of a covered judicial or administrative action or a non-SEC related action. The amendments: expand the scope of related actions eligible for an award under the SEC’s whistleblower program; clarify that the SEC may use its statutory authority under Section 21F to consider the dollar amount of a potential award to increase an award but provide that the SEC will not use any statutory authority it might have to decrease the amount of an award; and make several conforming changes and technical corrections.

Proposed Rules

Per Release No. 34-95431, the SEC is proposing rules under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) to help improve the governance of clearing agencies registered with the Commission (“registered clearing agencies”) by reducing the likelihood that conflicts of interest may influence the board of directors or equivalent governing body (“board”) of a registered clearing agency. The proposed rules would identify certain responsibilities of the board, increase transparency into board governance, and, more
generally, improve the alignment of incentives among owners and participants of a registered clearing agency. In support of these objectives, the proposed rules would establish new requirements for board and committee composition, independent directors, management of conflicts of interest, and board oversight.

Per Release No. IA-6083, the CFTC and the SEC are proposing to amend Form PF, the confidential reporting form for certain SEC-registered investment advisers to private funds, including those that also are registered with the CFTC as a commodity pool operator (“CPO”) or commodity trading adviser (“CTA”). The amendments are designed to enhance the Financial Stability Oversight Council’s (“FSOC’s”) ability to monitor systemic risk as well as bolster the SEC’s regulatory oversight of private fund advisers and investor protection efforts. In connection with the amendments to Form PF, the SEC proposes to amend a rule under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the “Advisers Act”) to revise instructions for requesting a temporary hardship exemption. The Commissions also are soliciting comment on the proposed rules and a number of alternatives, including whether certain possible changes to the proposal should apply to Form ADV.

Interim Final Rules

There were no interim final rules in August.

Interpretive Releases

There were no interpretive releases in August.

Policy Statements

There were no policy statements in August.

NFA

Notices to Members

Notice I-22-18

August 30, 2022

SD notice filing requirements under CFTC Regulation 23.154

CFTC Regulation 23.154 requires swap dealer (SD) Members that are subject to the CFTC Margin Rules and approved by NFA to use initial margin (IM) models to notify the CFTC and NFA of certain events related to an NFA-approved IM model. Starting September 1, 2022, SD Members must file these notices through NFA's WinJammer filing system and not via email.

The specific notices required are detailed below.

Modifications to an Approved Model

SD Members are required to notify the CFTC and NFA in writing 60 days prior to:

Extending the use of a previously approved IM model to an additional product type;
Making any change to any previously approved IM model that would result in a material change to the SD's assessment of IM requirements; or
Making any material change to modeling assumptions used by the IM model.

This notification requirement does not apply to new releases of ISDA SIMM made by ISDA.

Material Issues with an Approved Model

SD Members must promptly notify the CFTC and NFA if the IM model validation process reveals any material problems with the model. The SD also must describe any remedial actions taken and adjust the model to ensure an appropriately conservative amount of required IM is being calculated. This requirement extends to material issues identified during ongoing monitoring and the validation activities of each new version of SIMM, in light of its application to the SD Member's specific portfolio. At a minimum, an SD Member must notify NFA and the CFTC when it identifies problems with its IM model exceeding internal remediation thresholds. The notice filing must include:

Counterparty and portfolio IDs;
When and how the problem was identified, including relevant thresholds and testing results;
Detailed description of the model performance issue (e.g., risk factors causing exceedances, sensitivity amounts, market volatility relative to IM model calibration, nonlinear effects, risks-not-in-IM-model);
Remediation plan, including associated compensating controls;
Identified need for add-ons/multipliers, including amounts/values;
Current status of negotiations with the counterparty; and
Remediation timeline.

An SD Member should not delay filing the required notice due to incomplete information related to the remediation plan and timeline. The SD Member must amend its initial notice to provide updated information on remediation, if necessary.

Step-by-step notice filing instructions are available in the Margin Model WinJammer Notice User Guide.

News Releases

August 18, 2022

NFA orders London, U.K. firm Makor Securities London Ltd. to pay a $375,000 fine

August 18, Chicago—NFA has ordered Makor Securities London Ltd. (Makor) to pay a $375,000 fine. Makor is a former introducing broker (IB) and current provisionally registered swap dealer Member of NFA located in London, U.K.

The Decision, issued by NFA's Business Conduct Committee (BCC), is based on a Complaint issued by the BCC and a settlement offer submitted by Makor, in which the firm neither admitted nor denied the allegations in the Complaint. The BCC's Complaint alleged that Makor, in its capacity as an IB, failed to disclose to NFA intra-month transfers of assets with an affiliate between August 2021 and February 2022, which gave the impression Makor was holding the assets at all times during this period. The Complaint also alleged that Makor represented to NFA, through a former associated person (AP) of Makor, that the firm held the assets as inventory when the AP should have known the firm transferred the assets to its affiliate and, therefore, was not holding them as inventory. In addition, the Complaint alleged that Makor failed to maintain at all times the required minimum adjusted net capital during various periods since July 2017 and failed to give timely notice to NFA of the firm's capital shortfalls. Lastly, the Complaint alleged that Makor failed to adequately supervise its employees and agents in the conduct of their commodity interest activities for or on behalf of the firm.

In its Decision, the BCC found that Makor violated NFA Compliance Rules 2-4 and 2-9(a) and NFA Financial Requirement Sections 4, 5(a) and 5(c).

The complete text of the Complaint and Decision can be viewed on NFA's website.

August 18, 2022

NFA permanently bars Denver-based commodity pool operator Yas Castellum LLC and its principal Marcus Brisco from membership

August 18, Chicago—NFA has permanently barred Yas Castellum LLC (Yas), a former NFA Member and commodity pool operator located in Denver, Colorado, and Marcus Brisco, its former principal, and associated person, from membership and from acting as a principal of an NFA Member.

The default Decision, issued by NFA's Business Conduct Committee (BCC), is based on a Complaint issued by the BCC and Yas and Brisco's failure to file an Answer. The BCC found that Yas failed to operate its commodity pool as a separate legal entity, failed to receive funds in the name of its commodity pool, and commingled pool funds with the property of other persons. The BCC also found that Yas and Brisco failed to uphold high standards of commercial honor and just and equitable principles of trade by, among other things, operating the commodity pool in a manner that showed no regard for safeguarding the money they solicited and accepted from the pool participants. In addition, the BCC found that Yas and Brisco failed to cooperate in NFA's examination of Yas.

The complete text of the Complaint and Decision can be viewed on NFA's website.

August 24, 2022

NFA Board appoints Dale Spoljaric as new Vice President, Capital & Exams

August 24, Chicago—NFA's Board of Directors approved the appointment of Dale Spoljaric as Vice President, Capital & Exams at its August meeting.

"We are extremely pleased to promote Dale to this important leadership position," says NFA's CEO and President Thomas Sexton. "With his significant regulatory experience and expertise in futures commission merchant and swap dealer capital, segregation, and margin, Dale will play an important role leading our rigorous regulatory oversight programs."

Mr. Spoljaric has been with NFA for close to ten years. He has served as a Managing Director in both NFA's Futures Compliance and OTC Derivatives Compliance departments. Before joining NFA, Mr. Spoljaric served as U.S. Head of Agency Derivative Services Compliance at Barclays Capital, Inc. He began his career as an FCM Examiner with CME Group. Mr. Spoljaric holds a Bachelor of Science degree from Marquette University and is a registered CPA in Illinois.Bottom of Form

Hot Issues

In June, the SEC charged a broker-dealer and five of its registered representatives with violating Best Interest Obligation rules (Regulation Best Interest or Reg BI). The SEC alleged that the defendants failed to comply with Reg BI’s Care Obligation both because they did not exercise reasonable diligence, care, and skill to understand the risks, rewards, and costs associated with an unrated, high-risk debt security, and also because they recommended such security to at least seven particular customers without a reasonable basis to believe they were in their customers’ best interests. The SEC also alleged that the broker-dealer failed to comply with Reg BI’s “Compliance Obligation” because it did not adequately establish, maintain, and enforce written policies and procedures reasonably designed to achieve compliance with Reg BI.

Reg BI continues to be a focus area for regulators, and it is important to review your program to ensure that it addresses all aspects of Reg BI as it relates to your business.

Our Perspective

For more information, please contact:

Mitch Avnet

p. (646) 346-2468

mavnet@compliance-risk.com

David Amster

p. (917) 568-6470

damster@compliance-risk.com

Sources:

FINRA August 2022 Industry Notices
SEC Regulatory Actions
SEC Press Release 2022-110
NFA Notice to Members
NFA Press Releases

The post Monthly Regulatory Summary (August 2022) appeared first on Compliance Risk Concepts.

Monthly Regulatory Summary (February 2022)

CRC — Wed, 02 Mar 2022 15:23:30 +0000

Monthly Regulatory Summary

FINRA

Regulatory Notices

Per Notice 22-05, FINRA has adopted amendments to Rule 2165 (Financial Exploitation of Specified Adults) to permit member firms to: (1) place a hold on a securities transaction (in addition to the already-permitted hold on a disbursement of funds or securities) where there is a reasonable belief of financial exploitation; and (2) extend a temporary hold on a disbursement or transaction for an additional 30 business days, beyond the current maximum of 25 business days (for a total of 55 business days), if the member firm has reported the matter to a state regulator or agency, or a court of competent jurisdiction. The amendments to Rule 2165 become effective March 17, 2022.

The rule text is available in Attachment A.

Per Notice 22-06, the U.S. government has imposed sanctions in response to Russia’s actions in Ukraine. FINRA is issuing this Notice to provide member firms with information about these recent actions. FINRA encourages member firms to continue to monitor the Department of Treasury’s Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC) website for relevant information.

Special Notices

There were no Special Notices in February.

SEC

Final Rules

There were no Final Rules in February.

Proposed Rules

Per Release No. IA-5955, the SEC is proposing new rules under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the “Advisers Act” or the “Act”). The SEC proposes to require registered investment advisers to private funds to provide transparency to their investors regarding the full cost of investing in private funds and the performance of such private funds. The SEC also is proposing rules that would require a registered private fund adviser to obtain an annual financial statement audit of each private fund it advises and, in connection with an adviser-led secondary transaction, a fairness opinion from an independent opinion provider. In addition, the SEC is proposing rules that would prohibit all private fund advisers, including those that are not registered with the Commission, from engaging in certain sales practices, conflicts of interest, and compensation schemes that are contrary to the public interest and the protection of investors. All private fund advisers would also be prohibited from providing preferential treatment to certain investors in a private fund, unless the adviser discloses such treatment to other current and prospective investors. The SEC is proposing corresponding amendments to the Advisers Act books and records rule to facilitate compliance with these proposed new rules and assist our examination staff. Finally, the SEC is proposing amendments to the Advisers Act compliance rule, which would affect all registered investment advisers, to better enable SEC staff to conduct examinations.

Per Release No. 33-11028, the SEC is proposing new rules under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“Advisers Act”) and the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“Investment Company Act”) to require registered investment advisers (“advisers”) and investment companies (“funds”) to adopt and implement written cybersecurity policies and procedures reasonably designed to address cybersecurity risks. The SEC also is proposing a new rule and form under the Advisers Act to require advisers to report significant cybersecurity incidents affecting the adviser, or its fund or private fund clients, to the Commission. With respect to disclosure, the SEC is proposing amendments to various forms regarding the disclosure related to significant cybersecurity risks and cybersecurity incidents that affect advisers and funds and their clients and shareholders. Finally, the SEC is proposing new recordkeeping requirements under the Advisers Act and Investment Company Act.

Per Release No. 34-94196, the SEC proposes rules to shorten the standard settlement cycle for most broker-dealer transactions from two business days after the trade date (“T+2”) to one business day after the trade date (“T+1”). To facilitate a T+1 standard settlement cycle, the SEC also proposes new requirements for the processing of institutional trades by broker-dealers, investment advisers, and certain clearing agencies. These requirements are designed to protect investors, reduce risk, and increase operational efficiency. The SEC proposes to require compliance with a T+1 standard settlement cycle, if adopted, by March 31, 2024. The SEC also solicits comment on how best to further advance beyond T+1.

Per Release No. 33-11030, the SEC is proposing to amend certain rules that govern beneficial ownership reporting. The proposed amendments would modernize the filing deadlines for initial and amended beneficial ownership reports filed on Schedules 13D and 13G. The proposed amendments also would deem holders of certain cash-settled derivative securities as beneficial owners of the reference equity securities and clarify the disclosure requirements of Schedule 13D with respect to derivative securities. In addition, the proposed amendments would clarify and affirm the operation of the regulation as applied to two or more persons that form a group under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and provide new exemptions to permit such persons to communicate and consult with each other, jointly engage issuers and execute certain transactions without being subject to regulation as a group. The SEC also is proposing to amend provisions regarding the date on which Schedules 13D and 13G filings are deemed to have been made. Finally, the SEC is proposing to require that Schedules 13D and 13G be filed using a structured, machine-readable data language.

Per Release No. 34-94212, the SEC is proposing for public comment amendments to the SEC’s rules implementing its whistleblower program. The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) provides for, among other things, the issuance of monetary awards to any eligible whistleblower who voluntarily provides the SEC with original information about a securities law violation that leads to the SEC’s success in obtaining a monetary order of more than a million dollars in a covered judicial or administrative action brought by the SEC (“covered action”). If an eligible whistleblower qualifies for an award, Section 21F requires an award that is at least 10 percent, but no more than 30 percent, of the amount of the monetary sanctions collected in the covered action. The receipt of an award in a covered action also enables a whistleblower to qualify for an award in connection with judicial or administrative actions based on the whistleblower’s same original information and brought by the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) and certain other statutorily identified agencies or entities (“related actions”). The proposed rules would make two substantive changes to the Commission’s whistleblower rules that implement the whistleblower program, as well as several conforming amendments and technical corrections.

Per Release No. 34-94313, the SEC is proposing a new rule and related form pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), including Section 13(f)(2), which was added by Section 929X of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“DFA”). The proposed rule and related form are designed to provide greater transparency through the publication of short sale related data to investors and other market participants. Under the rule, institutional investment managers that meet or exceed a specified reporting threshold would be required to report, on a monthly basis using the proposed form, specified short position data and short activity data for equity securities. In addition, the SEC is proposing a new rule under the Exchange Act to prescribe a new “buy to cover” order marking requirement, and proposing to amend the national market system plan governing the consolidated audit trail (“CAT”) created pursuant to the Exchange Act to require the reporting of “buy to cover” order marking information and reliance on the bona fide market making exception in the Commission’s short sale rules. The SEC is publishing the text of the proposed amendments to the CAT NMS Plan in a separate notice.

Per Release No. 34-94314, the SEC is publishing notice of the text of the proposed amendments to the National Market System Plan Governing the Consolidated Audit Trail (“CAT NMS Plan”) in connection with the Commission’s issuance of Release No. 34-94313, the “Short Position and Short Activity Reporting by Institutional Investment Managers” (the “Proposing Release”).

Per Release No. 34-94315, on November 18, 2021, the SEC issued for comment a proposed rule under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) in Release No. 34-93613 (Nov. 18, 2021), 86 FR 69802 (Dec. 8, 2021) regarding the reporting of securities loans. The Commission is reopening the comment period for the proposed rule in light of the proposed Exchange Act rule regarding short sale disclosure. In particular, the SEC is soliciting comment on any potential effects of the proposed Exchange Act rule regarding short sale disclosure that the Commission should consider in determining whether to adopt the proposed Exchange Act rule regarding the reporting of securities loans.

Interim Final Rules

There were no interim final rules in February.

Interpretive Releases

There were no interpretive releases in February.

Policy Statements

There were no policy statements in February.

NFA

Notices to Members

Per Notice I-22-05:

February 01, 2022

Extension of relief from the on-site annual inspection of branch offices and guaranteed IBs

Due to COVID-19, NFA allowed Members to conduct all calendar year 2020 and 2021 annual inspections of branch offices and guaranteed introducing brokers (IB) remotely (see Notices to Members I-20-35 and I-21-25). NFA is extending the relief provided in Notices I-20-35 and I-21-25 through the end of 2022. Although Members must conduct the required annual inspection of each branch office and guaranteed IB by December 31, 2022, firms may conduct these inspections remotely. A Member that conducts a remote examination in 2022 based on this relief may still conduct a remote examination in 2023 if its risk assessment indicates it is appropriate to do so. This risk assessment should take into account when the firm most recently conducted an on-site exam.

Per Notice I-22-06:

February 02, 2022

Notice of Members Elected to NFA's Board of Directors and Nominating Committee

Board of Directors

This year there was one contested election in the CPO/CTA category of NFA's Board of Directors. The result of the election is as follows:

CPO/CTA Category:

Douglas L. Bry, Augur Trading Company

During its meeting on January 20, 2022, NFA's Executive Committee, pursuant to Article VII, Section (3)(c) and Article X, Section 3 of NFA's Articles of Incorporation, elected the following nominees to the Board and Nominating Committee:

Board of Directors

FCM Category:

Scott Andersen*, SG Americas Securities LLC
Gerald F. Corcoran, R.J. O'Brien & Associates LLC
Maureen C. Downs, Phillip Capital, Inc.

IB Category:

Scott W. Stewart, Stewart-Peterson Group, Inc.

CPO/CTA Category:

Constance R. Wick, Crabel Capital Management LLC

SD/MSP/RFED Category:

Mark L. Maurer, StoneX Markets LLC
William F. McCoy, Morgan Stanley
Don Thompson, JP Morgan Chase & Co.

2022 NFA Nominating Committee

FCM Category:

David Allocco*, Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.

IB Category:

Trent Hurley*, Hurley & Associates, Inc.

CPO/CTA Category:

Simon Raykher*, Kepos Capital LP

SD/MSP/RFED Category:

Syed Ali*, Barclays Bank PLC

The terms of NFA's Board of Directors and Nominating Committee members will begin on February 17, 2022. Board members representing contract markets serve one-year terms. All other Board members serve two-year terms. Nominating Committee members serve three-year terms.

* Newly elected

Per Notice I-22-07:

February 22, 2022

NFA's Board of Directors re-elects Maureen C. Downs to serve as Chair

At its February meeting, NFA's Board of Directors re-elected Maureen C. Downs, Phillip Capital, Inc., to serve a one-year term as Chair. The Board also re-elected Don Thompson, JPMorgan Chase & Co., to serve as Vice-Chair.

In addition, the Board elected the following individuals to serve as public directors for two-year terms:

Ana Beskin, Amazon People Experience and Tech;
Ronald F. Filler, New York Law School;
Arthur W. Hahn;
Mary M. McDonnell, McDonnell & Associates; and
Michael H. Moskow, The Chicago Council on Global Affairs.

The Board also elected the following individuals to serve one-year terms on NFA's Executive Committee:

Mark G. Bagan, Minneapolis Grain Exchange;
Seth P. Bender, HSBC Bank PLC;
Douglas L. Bry, Augur Trading Company;
Michael T. Burke, HighGround Trading LLC;
Michael C. Dawley, Bluefin Partners LLC;
Arthur W. Hahn;
Julie Holzrichter, CME Group, Inc.;
Ernest L. Jaffarian, Efficient Capital Management LLC;
Thomas R. Kadlec, ADM Investor Services, Inc.;
Mary M. McDonnell, McDonnell & Associates;
Michael H. Moskow, The Chicago Council on Global Affairs;
Todd E. Petzel, Offit Capital Advisors LLC; and
Don Thompson, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Ms. Downs, NFA Permanent Special Advisor Leo Melamed, and NFA's President also serve on the Executive Committee.

News Releases

February 28, 2022

NFA orders Newport Beach, Calif. commodity trading advisor Plus EV Capital LLC never to reapply for NFA membership

February 28, Chicago—NFA has ordered Plus EV Capital LLC (EV Capital), a former NFA Member commodity trading advisor located in Newport Beach, Calif., never to reapply for membership or act as a principal of an NFA Member. NFA also ordered Rohit Chopra, EV Capital's sole owner, principal and associated person, not to reapply for membership or act as a principal of an NFA Member for three years. If Chopra seeks NFA membership following the three-year period, he must pay a $100,000 fine.

The Decision, issued by an NFA Hearing Panel, is based on a Complaint issued by NFA's Business Conduct Committee and a settlement offer submitted by EV Capital and Chopra, in which they neither admitted nor denied the allegations. The Complaint alleges that EV Capital and Chopra placed unauthorized trades in customers' accounts, misrepresented to customers about the trades placed in their accounts, made highly risky trades in a customer's account and manipulated allocation instructions to benefit Chopra to the detriment of customers.

The complete text of the Complaint and Decision can be viewed on NFA's website.

Bottom of Form

Hot Issues

CyberCrime

Cybercrime is constantly developing. With attacks becoming more prevalent and sophisticated. Now is the time to perform a cybersecurity check for your firm to ensure not only compliance with industry standards, but confirm the firm’s ability to prevent, detect, and respond to evolving cyber threats. Prevention begins with training; make certain that in addition to proper security measures, applicable personnel has been rigorously trained with respect to information and technology security measures.

Regulatory Exam Preparedness

Regulators have been out in force throughout the pandemic and continue to do so. We have observed trends toward lengthy, deeper dive exams, conducted remotely. Firms should consider initiatives aimed at identifying and remediating regulatory gaps in their programs, particularly with respect to current exam focus area trends.

Our Perspective

For more information, please contact:

Mitch Avnet

p. (646) 346-2468

mavnet@compliance-risk.com

David Amster

p. (917) 568-6470

damster@compliance-risk.com

Sources:

FINRA February 2022 Industry Notices
SEC Regulatory Actions
NFA Notices
NFA News Releases

The post Monthly Regulatory Summary (February 2022) appeared first on Compliance Risk Concepts.

SEC Offers Guidance on Form CRS

CRC — Tue, 18 Jan 2022 15:41:14 +0000

Overview

As firms prepare their annual ADV updates or review their compliance programs, one area where advisers and brokers who provide services to retail clients should highlight is Form CRS.

On December 17, 2021, the staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission issued observations and guidance regarding Form CRS disclosures required of SEC-registered broker-dealers and investment advisers who offer services to retail investors. The statement provides insight into CRS findings for recently examined firms. While SEC staff notes that they did observe appropriately drafted Form CRS samples from various firms, there were consistent issues found across a broad sampling within the industry. Areas where CRS improvements were most frequently noted are described below and represent areas where firms should pay close attention when reviewing the CRS to see if updates are necessary, whether or not material changes have occurred this year.

Areas of Focus

Plain English

The purpose of Regulation Best Interest and the Form CRS is to create transparency within the financial service industry. As such, the Form CRS should not contain legal jargon or esoteric industry terms that may inhibit comprehension amongst retail investors.

Live Hyperlinks

Firms were cited for including the text of links in their Form CRS which did not navigate to the correct destination or were not actually live hyperlinks. All hyperlinks to regulatory resources or additional disclosure must be live.

Delivery

Perhaps the most common deficiency cited amongst broker-dealers and investment advisers was their failure to properly deliver or evidence such delivery of Form CRS. Ensure that the Form CRS is delivered at the appropriate point in a retail client’s relationship with the firm. Policies, procedures, training, and recordkeeping should all support this distribution process.

Proper Format

Many firms were cited for failure to comply with the formatting requirements imposed by the Form CRS instructions. Firms should take care to confirm that all required headings, conversation starters, emphasized text, etc. are included throughout the document.

Website

Form CRS should be prominently linked, along with other documents such as the firm’s Form ADV Part 2 and privacy policy, on a firm’s publicly available website. This should always be updated whenever the Form CRS is updated to ensure that the most current version is available on the website.

Conflicts of Interest

Conflicts of interest are not static and can evolve over time as industry relationships, products, client-base, fee structures, etc. change and develop. As such, firms should be aware that all new conflicts (whether real, potential, or perceived) must be reported to compliance for possible inclusion in Form CRS, Form ADV Part 2, or other relevant disclosure documents.

Monitoring For Updates

CRC recommends that firms adopt a process whereby trigger events for Form CRS updates are recognized, tracked, and implemented within Form CRS by compliance. Such process should also include identifying material updates and tracking and confirmation of related re-distributions of the Form to current retail investors, clients, and customers. Such trigger events could include updates and changes to offerings, fees, compensation structure, or any other content within Form CRS.

Conclusion

The Commission is not likely to give firms a break regarding Form CRS in 2022; in fact, CRC anticipates quite the opposite. We consider that 2021 was the honeymoon period for Regulation Best Interest, and even so, it brought 27+ enforcement actions related to Form CRS alone. Those actions, in conjunction with the most recent guidance and findings from the SEC should serve as both a warning and a road map as firms review and update their Form CRS.

Next Steps for Advisers and Broker-Dealers

As always, CRC believes that the most effective compliance program is a proactive one. Accordingly, CRC recommends that advisers take this opportunity to review existing Form CRS content, format, and any related practices, policies, and procedures to ensure they adhere to current rules, and evaluate and implement any process re-engineering that might be necessary to comply fully with both Regulation Best Interest and the Form CRS instructions.

Contact Us

To discuss the Form CRS, contact a regulatory specialist at CRC. Our team is available to assist with outsourced policy and procedure management, gap analysis, policy implementation, and training.

The post SEC Offers Guidance on Form CRS appeared first on Compliance Risk Concepts.

News Reminder: SEC Approves FINRA Rules Change

CRC — Thu, 13 Jan 2022 12:53:22 +0000

Overview

In an order^[1] dated July 30, 2021, the SEC approved the adoption of new FINRA Rule 4111 and Rule 9561 and the amendment of Rule 9559. FINRA has extended the effective date for the proposed rule change to no later than 180 days after publication of a Regulatory Notice announcing this Commission approval. At time of this update, FINRA has not yet published such a Regulatory Notice.

From the SEC’s approval order:

The proposal to establish a process in new Rule 4111 to identify members firms that present a high degree of risk to the investing public, based on numeric thresholds of firm-level and individual-level disclosure events, and then impose a Restricted Deposit Requirement, conditions or restrictions on the member firm’s operations, or both, will help protect investors and encourage such member firms to change their behavior. FINRA has designed the proposed rule change to establish an annual, multi-step process to determine whether a member firm raises investor protection concerns substantial enough to require the imposition of additional obligations, while allowing identified firms several means of challenging FINRA’s decisions and affecting the ultimate outcome.

The Department would begin each member firms’ annual Rule 4111 review process by calculating specified “Preliminary Identification Metrics” for each firm for each of six categories of events or conditions, collectively defined as the “Disclosure Event and Expelled Firm Association Categories.”

The six categories are: (1) Registered Person Adjudicated Events; (2) Registered Person Pending Events; (3) Registered Person Termination and Internal Review Events; (4) Member Firm Adjudicated Events; (5) Member Firm Pending Events; and (6) Registered Persons Associated with Previously Expelled Firms (also referred to as the Expelled Firm Association category).

There are numeric thresholds for seven different firm sizes, to provide that each member firm would be compared only to its similarly sized peers.

If the Department determines that a member firm warrants further review under Rule 4111, and such member firm would be meeting the Preliminary Criteria for Identification for the first time, the member firm would have a one-time opportunity to reduce its staffing level to avoid meeting the Preliminary Criteria for Identification, within 30 business days after being informed by the Department that it met the Preliminary Criteria for Identification. However, if the Department determines that the member firm still meets the Preliminary Criteria for Identification (or if the member firm did not opted to reduce staffing levels) the Department would determine the firm’s maximum Restricted Deposit Requirement, and the member firm would proceed to a “Consultation” with the Department.

During the Consultation, the Department would give the member firm an opportunity to demonstrate why it does not meet the Preliminary Criteria for Identification, why it should not be designated as a Restricted Firm, and why it should not be subject to the maximum Restricted Deposit Requirement. (42930) Pursuant to Proposed Rule 4111(e)(2), the Department would provide the member firm with written notice of its decision no later than 30 days from the date of FINRA’s letter scheduling the Consultation, stating any conditions or restrictions to be imposed, and the ability of the member firm to request a hearing with the Office of Hearing Officers in an expedited proceeding.

Under new Rule 9561(a)(1), the Department would serve to the member firm a notice of the Department’s decision following the Rule 4111 process. The proposed rule change would also provide that if a member firm does not request a hearing, the decision would constitute final FINRA action. In general, a request for a hearing would not stay any of the Rule 4111 Requirements imposed in the Department’s decision, which would be immediately effective with one exception being when member requests review of imposition of Restricted Deposit Requirement. In that case, the firm would be required to deposit the lesser of 25% of its Restricted Deposit Requirement or 25% of its average excess net capital over the prior year, while the proceeding is pending.

If a member firm fails to comply with any of the requirements imposed on it under Rule 4111, the Department would be authorized to serve a notice pursuant to proposed Rule 9561 stating that the member firm’s continued failure to comply within seven days of service of the notice would result in a suspension or cancellation of membership.

If a member firm requests a hearing under proposed Rule 9561, the hearing would be subject to Rule 9559 (Hearing Procedures for Expedited Proceedings Under the Rule 9550 Series).

Opportunities for CRC to Assist Your Firm

CRC can proactively conduct a review of your current compliance program to identify opportunities to potentially implement enhancements before the annual Rule 4111 reviews begin.
Between now and the effective date of this rule, CRC can help your firm to quickly scale up its compliance program with CRC resources to address concern areas.

Please contact Mitch Avnet or for more information.

Mitch Avnet at mavnet@compliance-risk.com or (646) 346.2468

^[1] SR-FINRA-2020-041 Approval Order, https://www.finra.org/sites/default/files/2021-08/sr-finra-2020-041-approval-order.pdf

The post News Reminder: SEC Approves FINRA Rules Change appeared first on Compliance Risk Concepts.

Monthly Regulatory Summary (December 2021)

CRC — Tue, 04 Jan 2022 14:31:33 +0000

Monthly Regulatory Summary

FINRA

Regulatory Notices

Per Notice 21-42, FINRA alerted firms to a recently identified vulnerability in Apache Log4J software, which is an open-source, Java-based logging utility widely used by enterprise applications and cloud services. The “Log4Shell” vulnerability presents risk for member firms because they may be using this software in internal applications, or the software may be embedded in third-party software packages. In addition, many applications written in Java are potentially vulnerable.

Bad actors may take advantage of this vulnerability to compromise systems to potentially steal information or engage in fraudulent activities. For example, a remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability to take control of an affected system.

FINRA reminded firms that the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Regulation S-P Rule 30 requires firms to have written policies and procedures that are reasonably designed to safeguard customer records and information and FINRA Rule 4370 (Business Continuity Plans and Emergency Contact Information) also applies to denials of service and other interruptions to members’ operations. In addition to firms’ compliance with SEC regulations, FINRA expects firms to develop reasonably designed cybersecurity programs and controls that are consistent with their risk profile, business model and scale of operations.

For more information, firms should review the resources provided on FINRA’s Cybersecurity Topic Page.

Per Notice 21-43, in August 2019, FINRA launched a retrospective review that, among other things, sought stakeholders’ input on the effectiveness of Rule 3240 (Borrowing from or Lending to Customers). Based on feedback received during the review, FINRA is proposing amendments to Rule 3240 to:

emphasize that the rule generally prohibits registered persons from entering into borrowing or lending arrangements with their customers;
clarify that the rule applies to borrowing or lending arrangements that pre-exist the broker-customer relationship;
extend the rule to prohibit entering into borrowing or lending arrangements within six months after the broker-customer relationship ends;
extend the rule to prohibit borrowing or lending arrangements with persons related to either the registered person or the customer, such as an arrangement between the registered person and the customer’s spouse or between the registered person’s outside business and the customer;
modernize the “immediate family” definition;
narrow the scope of the “personal relationship” exception; and
provide factors for evaluating whether an arrangement is within the “personal relationship” or “business relationship” exceptions.

This Notice seeks comment on the proposed amendments to Rule 3240. This Notice also summarizes the predominant themes that emerged from stakeholder feedback, provides guidance to aid member firms when evaluating whether to approve a borrowing or lending arrangement that is within one of the limited exceptions to the general prohibition, and invites a broader consideration of the distinctions between Rule 3240 and federal and state approaches for regulating borrowing and lending arrangements between investment adviser representatives and their clients.

Per Notice 21-44, in February 2019, FINRA published Regulatory Notice 19-06, launching a retrospective review of Rule 4370 (Business Continuity Plans and Emergency Contact Information) to assess its effectiveness and efficiency (the BCP Rule Review). The COVID-19 pandemic, beginning in early 2020, caused unprecedented regulatory and operational impacts on member firms and other market participants, as well as regulators. During the early stages of the pandemic and while the BCP Rule Review was still underway, FINRA published Regulatory Notice 20-08 (March 2020) encouraging each member firm to review its business continuity plan (BCP) to consider pandemic preparedness and to review its emergency contacts to ensure that FINRA has a reliable means of contacting the firm.

Further, to understand broader pandemic-related regulatory and operational impacts on member firms and other stakeholders, in December 2020, through Regulatory Notice 20-42, FINRA launched a retrospective review on lessons learned from member firms and their customers’ experiences during the pandemic (the Pandemic Review).

Based on the BCP Rule Review and the Pandemic Review, both of which involved extensive feedback from a wide range of internal and external stakeholders, FINRA has determined to maintain Rule 4370 without change. This Notice summarizes the retrospective rule review process, the predominant themes that emerged from stakeholder feedback and resulting actions in both reviews, and provides guidance to member firms.

Per Notice 21-45, FINRA is updating the imbedded text of Securities Exchange Act (SEA) financial responsibility rules in the Interpretations of Financial and Operational Rules to reflect the effectiveness of amendments the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted. The updated imbedded text relates to SEA Rules 15c3-1, 15c3-1a, 15c3-1b, 15c3-1d, 15c3-1e, 15c3-3, 15Fi-1 through 15Fi-5, 17a-3, 17a-4, 17a-5, 17a-11 and 18a-3. FINRA is also making available related updates of the Interpretations of Financial and Operational Rules that have been communicated to FINRA by the staff of the SEC’s Division of Trading and Markets (SEC staff). The updated interpretations relate to SEA Rules 15c3-1, 17a-3, 17a-4 and 17a-5.

Special Notices

There were no Special Notices in December.

SEC

Final Rules

Per Release No. 34-93701, the SEC adopted amendments to finalize interim final rules that revised Forms 20-F, 40-F, 10-K, and N-CSR to implement the disclosure and submission requirements of the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act (“HFCA Act”). The final amendments apply to registrants that the SEC identifies as having filed an annual report with an audit report issued by a registered public accounting firm that is located in a foreign jurisdiction and that the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) is unable to inspect or investigate completely because of a position taken by an authority in that jurisdiction. Consistent with the HFCA Act, the amendments require the submission of documentation to the SEC establishing that such a registrant is not owned or controlled by a governmental entity in that foreign jurisdiction and also require disclosure in a foreign issuer’s annual report regarding the audit arrangements of, and governmental influence on, such registrants.

Per Release No. 33-11016, the SEC adopted amendments to Volume II of the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval system (“EDGAR”) Filer Manual (“Filer Manual”) and related rules and forms. The EDGAR system was upgraded on December 20, 2021.

Proposed Rules

Per Release No. 33-11013, the SEC is proposing amendments to Rule 10b5-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The proposed amendments would add new conditions to the availability of the affirmative defense under Exchange Act Rule 10b5-1(c)(1) that are designed to address concerns about abuse of the rule to opportunistically trade securities on the basis of material nonpublic information in ways that harm investors and undermine the integrity of the securities markets. The SEC is also proposing new disclosure requirements regarding the insider trading policies of issuers, and the adoption and termination (including modification) of Rule 10b5‑1 and certain other trading arrangements by directors, officers, and issuers. In addition, the SEC is proposing amendments to the disclosure requirements for executive and director compensation regarding the timing of equity compensation awards made in close proximity in time to the issuer’s disclosure of material nonpublic information. Finally, the SEC is proposing amendments to Forms 4 and 5 to require corporate insiders subject to the reporting requirements of Exchange Act Section 16 to identify transactions made pursuant to a Rule 10b5-1(c)(1) trading arrangement, and to disclose all gifts of securities on Form 4.

Per Release No. 34-93783, the SEC is proposing amendments to modernize and improve disclosure about repurchases of an issuer’s equity securities that are registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Specifically, the proposed amendments would require an issuer to provide more timely disclosure on a new Form SR regarding purchases of its equity securities for each day that it, or an affiliated purchaser, makes a share repurchase. The proposed amendments would also enhance the existing periodic disclosure requirements about these purchases.

Per Release No. IC-34441, the SEC is proposing amendments to certain rules that govern money market funds under the Investment Company Act of 1940. The proposed amendments are designed to improve the resilience and transparency of money market funds. The proposal would remove the liquidity fee and redemption gate provisions in the existing rule, which would eliminate an incentive for preemptive redemptions from certain money market funds and could encourage funds to more effectively use their existing liquidity buffers in times of stress. The proposal would also require institutional prime and institutional tax-exempt money market funds to implement swing pricing policies and procedures to require redeeming investors to bear the liquidity costs of their decisions to redeem. The SEC is also proposing to increase the daily liquid asset and weekly liquid asset minimum liquidity requirements, to 25% and 50% respectively, to provide a more substantial buffer in the event of rapid redemptions. The proposal would amend certain reporting requirements on Forms N-MFP and N-CR to improve the availability of information about money market funds, as well as make certain conforming changes to Form N-1A to reflect our proposed changes to the regulatory framework for these funds. In addition, the SEC is proposing rule amendments to address how money market funds with stable net asset values should handle a negative interest rate environment. Finally, the SEC is proposing rule amendments to specify how funds must calculate weighted average maturity and weighted average life.

Per Release No. 34-93784, the SEC is re-proposing for comment a rule under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), which would be a new rule designed to prevent fraud, manipulation, and deception in connection with effecting transactions in, or inducing or attempting to induce the purchase or sale of, any security-based swap. The rule is designed specifically to take into account the unique features of a security-based swap and would explicitly reach misconduct in connection with the ongoing payments and deliveries that typically occur throughout the life of a security-based swap. The SEC also is proposing a new rule, which would make it unlawful for any officer, director, supervised person, or employee of a security-based swap dealer or major security-based swap participant, or any person acting under such person’s direction, to directly or indirectly take any action to coerce, manipulate, mislead, or fraudulently influence the security-based swap dealer’s or major security-based swap participant’s chief compliance officer (“CCO”) in the performance of their duties under the federal securities laws or the rules and regulations thereunder. Finally, the SEC is using its authority under the Exchange Act to propose for comment a new rule, which would require any person with a security-based swap position that exceeds a certain threshold to promptly file with the Commission a schedule disclosing certain information related to its security-based swap position.

Interim Final Rules

There were no interim final rules in December.

Interpretive Releases

There were no interpretive releases in December.

Policy Statements

There were no policy statements in December.

NFA

Notices to Members

Per Notice I-21-38:

December 01, 2021

Guidance on the annual affirmation requirement for entities currently operating under an exemption from CPO or CTA registration

The CFTC requires any person that claims an exemption from CPO registration under CFTC Regulation 4.13(a)(1), 4.13(a)(2), 4.13(a)(3), 4.13(a)(5), an exclusion from CPO registration under CFTC Regulation 4.5 or an exemption from CTA registration under 4.14(a)(8) (collectively, exemption) to annually affirm the applicable notice of exemption within 60 days of the calendar year end, which is March 1, 2022 for this affirmation cycle.

Failure to affirm an active exemption from CPO or CTA registration will result in the exemption being withdrawn on March 2, 2022. For registered CPOs or CTAs, withdrawal of the exemption will result in the entity being subject to Part 4 Requirements regardless of whether the entity otherwise remains eligible for the exemption. For non-registrants, the withdrawal of the exemption may subject the person or entity to enforcement action by the CFTC, if either continues to operate without registration or exemption.

The Notice includes instructions on how to complete the affirmation process.

The Notice also includes frequently asked questions about exemptions.

Per Notice I-21-39:

December 01, 2021

Reminder: Increases to NFA Member swap dealer and major swap participant dues effective January 1, 2022

NFA Bylaw 1301 imposes annual dues on NFA Member swap dealers (SD) and major swap participants (MSP). The current annual dues amounts have remained unchanged, except for a reduction in MSP annual dues, since NFA established its swap regulatory program in 2013. Given the expansion of NFA's swaps regulatory program over the past eight years, NFA's Board of Directors unanimously approved the following increases to these annual dues amounts, which will become effective January 1, 2022 for dues payable after that date:

Annual dues for large financial institution (LFI) SD Members will increase from $1,000,000 to $1,300,000;
Annual dues for non-LFI SD Members will increase from $250,000 to $325,000;
Annual dues for SD Members that are affiliates of SD Members paying dues in one of the above categories will increase from $150,000 to $200,000; and
Annual dues for MSP Members will increase from $150,000 to $200,000.

For more information on the increases, see Notice to Members I-21-16.

Per Notice I-21-40:

December 02, 2021

FCM and RFED filing requirements for Christmas and New Year's Day—Reminder for upcoming holidays

Christmas Day—Saturday, December 25, 2021

Daily segregated, 30.7 secured, cleared swaps customer collateral and daily forex statements prepared as of Thursday, December 23, 2021 are required to be submitted by 12:00 noon on Friday, December 24, 2021; and
Daily segregated, 30.7 secured, cleared swaps customer collateral and daily forex statements are required to be prepared as of Friday, December 24, 2021 and are required to be submitted by 12:00 noon on Monday, December 27, 2021.

New Year's Day—Saturday, January 1, 2022

Daily segregated, 30.7 secured, cleared swaps customer collateral and daily forex statements prepared as of Thursday, December 30, 2021 are required to be submitted by 12:00 noon on Friday, December 31, 2021;
Daily segregated, 30.7 secured, cleared swaps customer collateral and daily forex statements prepared as of Friday, December 31, 2021 are required to be submitted by 12:00 noon on Monday, January 3, 2022.

Any information filed by FCMs or RFEDs after its due date must be accompanied by a fee for each business day that it is late.

Holiday Filing Schedule

Per Notice I-21-41:

December 02, 2021

SD holiday filing requirements

Visit NFA's website to view schedules of 2022 swap dealer (SD) holiday filings, risk data and margin monitoring filingsand financial reporting due dates. We recommend viewing the schedules and keeping this Notice as a reference for the upcoming 2022 holiday filing requirements.

For more information about SD filing requirements visit NFA's website.

Per Notice I-21-42:

December 06, 2021

Action required: NFA adds virtual currency and micro contract-related questions to Annual Questionnaire

NFA Members must complete the Annual Questionnaire annually and update it throughout the year to reflect significant changes in business activity. Due to recent increased interest and activity in virtual currency and micro contract products, NFA has updated the Questionnaire to address Members' spot/physical virtual currency, virtual currency derivatives and micro contract transactions.

NFA requires all CPO, CTA, FCM, FDM and IB Members to complete the new questions as soon as possible to avoid unnecessary inquiries.

Per Notice I-21-43:

December 07, 2021

Action encouraged: CPO and CTA Members should ensure Executive Representative information is accurate prior to December 27, 2021 to facilitate voting in upcoming contested election

Contested Election in CPO and CTA Category

The upcoming 2022 Board of Directors election includes a contested election in the CPO and CTA category for a position with no conditions as to funds under management, as of June 30, 2021. Two individuals have been nominated for this position and therefore NFA will be conducting an election for CPO and CTA Members to vote for the individual to fill this Board position. More information on the candidates and the election process will be provided prior to the election period.

Who Can Vote in a Contested Election

Bylaw 409 requires each Member to designate an Executive Representative who has the sole authority, among other things, to cast votes on a Member's behalf in a contested election for an NFA Director position. Therefore, it is important that each CPO and CTA Member ensure that the individual currently listed as the Member's Executive Representative and their contact information are accurate. CPO and CTA Members should review, and if necessary, update this information prior to December 27, 2021 to ensure that NFA distributes the election materials to the appropriate Executive Representative.

Designate/Update Executive Representative

Each Member may designate or update its Executive Representative by accessing NFA's Executive Representative Contact form found on NFA's Electronic Filing Systems page. Only firm employees who are Security Manager(s) or are authorized to "View, Update, and File" information in ORS may complete this form.

If a Member has not designated an Executive Representative, the Membership Contact listed on the Member's Form 7-R will be deemed to be the Member's Executive Representative and will have the authority to cast votes on the Member's behalf.

Votes submitted by any person other than the Executive Representative (or the Membership Contact if no Executive Representative is designated) will be not be counted.

Per Notice I-21-44:

December 20, 2021

Effective date for amendment to exclude certain associated persons from the Branch Office Manager Examination requirement

NFA Compliance Rule 2-7 generally prohibits a Member from permitting an associated person (AP) to act as a branch office manager unless the individual has taken and passed NFA's Branch Office Manager Examination (Series 30). NFA recently amended NFA Compliance Rule 2-7 to exclude from the Series 30 requirement any swap AP acting as a branch office manager for a Member engaged solely in swap activities. NFA adopted this amendment because swap APs are also required to pass NFA's Swaps Proficiency Requirements, which include a section on supervision and are directly related to a Member's swap activities. Passing the Series 30, which in addition to supervision covers topics not directly applicable to a branch office solely engaged in swaps, is no longer necessary for these APs.

This amendment was unanimously approved by the Board and will become effective on January 3, 2022.

More information regarding this amendment can be found in NFA's November 22, 2021 submission letter to the CFTC.

Per Notice I-21-45:

December 21, 2021

Effective date for amendment to NFA Financial Requirements Section 18

NFA Financial Requirements Section 18 requires each swap dealer (SD) Member that is also a broker-dealer or security-based SD (SBSD) to file financial reports with NFA using the SEC's FOCUS report. NFA recently learned that certain SDs intend to comply with the CFTC's capital, margin, segregation, recordkeeping and reporting requirements in lieu of the equivalent SEC regulations, pursuant to SEC Rule 18a-10, and will not file the FOCUS report with the SEC. Therefore, NFA amended Financial Requirements Section 18 to require SBSDs that do not file the FOCUS report with the SEC to use one of the other two forms developed by NFA: Form FR-CSE-NLA or FR-CSE-BHC.

This amendment was unanimously approved by NFA's Board of Directors and is effective immediately.

NFA's November 22, 2021 submission letter to the CFTC contains more detailed information regarding this amendment.

Per Notice I-21-46:

December 29, 2021

Notice of Annual Meeting of NFA Members and Board and Nominating Committee Election

Notice of Annual Meeting

NFA will hold its Annual Meeting of Members (Annual Meeting) on Tuesday, February 1, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. (CST), at its offices located at 300 S. Riverside Plaza, Suite 1800, Chicago, IL. The agenda of the meeting is:

Opening remarks
Election of one (1) individual to NFA's Board of Directors (NFA Board) in the CPO and CTA category for a position with no conditions on its ranking of CPOs and CTAs reporting any funds under management allocated to futures and swaps on NFA Form PQR and NFA Form PR as of June 30, 2021 (At-Large position).
Members' questions regarding NFA-related topics.
Any other business that may properly come before the Annual Meeting.

To register to attend the Annual Meeting, please email your name, NFA ID# and contact email to membermeeting2022@nfa.futures.org. Registration is due by Friday, January 28, 2022, at 5:00 p.m. (CST).

News Releases

December 09, 2021

NFA orders Chicago, Ill. commodity trading advisor K-Ratio Advisory LLC and former introducing broker K-Ratio Brokerage LLC never to reapply for NFA membership

December 9, Chicago—NFA has ordered K-Ratio Advisory LLC (KRA), a CFTC-registered commodity trading advisor and former NFA Member located in Chicago, Ill., and K-Ratio Brokerage LLC (KRB), a previously CFTC-registered introducing broker Member located in Chicago, Ill., never to reapply for membership or act as a principal of an NFA Member.

The Decision, issued by NFA's Business Conduct Committee (BCC), is based on a Complaint issued by the BCC and a settlement offer submitted by KRA and KRB, in which they neither admitted nor denied the allegations. The Complaint alleges that KRA and KRB operated an unregulated trading program without having adequate financial wherewithal to do so. The Complaint also alleges that KRA and KRB used misleading and deceptive promotional material and communications. The Complaint also alleges that KRA and KRB allowed an unregistered individual to act as an associated person without being registered in such capacity and an NFA Associate. Finally, the Complaint alleges that KRA and KRB failed to supervise.

The complete text of the Complaint and Decision can be viewed on NFA's website.

December 16, 2021

NFA statement regarding confirmation of Russ Behnam as CFTC Chairman

December 16, Chicago—NFA congratulates Rostin (Russ) Behnam on his confirmation as Chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. His deep knowledge and experience are integral to advancing our common mission of protecting investors and ensuring market integrity. We look forward to working with Chairman Behnam and the Commission on our industry's important regulatory matters.

- Thomas W. Sexton, III, NFA President and CEO

Hot Issues

CyberCrime

Regulatory Exam Preparedness

Our Perspective

For more information, please contact:

Mitch Avnet

p. (646) 346-2468

mavnet@compliance-risk.com

David Amster

p. (917) 568-6470

damster@compliance-risk.com

Sources:

FINRA December 2021 Industry Notices
SEC Regulatory Actions
NFA Notices

The post Monthly Regulatory Summary (December 2021) appeared first on Compliance Risk Concepts.

Monthly Regulatory Summary (September 2021)

CRC — Wed, 06 Oct 2021 13:56:01 +0000

FINRA

Regulatory Notices

Per Notice 21-31, FINRA has established a new Supplemental Liquidity Schedule (SLS). The new SLS, which members subject to the requirement will need to file as a supplement to the FOCUS Report, is designed to improve FINRA’s ability to monitor for events that signal an adverse change in the liquidity risk of the members with the largest customer and counterparty exposures. FINRA is issuing this Notice to provide further information on the new requirement, which will become effective on March 1, 2022. For members subject to the requirement, the first SLS must be completed as of the end of March 2022 and will be due by May 4, 2022.

The SLS, and instructions thereto, is available in Attachment A. FINRA will make the SLS available through FINRA Gateway.

Per Notice 21-32, FINRA requests comment on a proposed change to its current policy relating to the assignment of OTC symbols to unlisted equity securities. Specifically, FINRA is considering whether it should begin assigning OTC symbols to unlisted equity securities that do not have a valid CUSIP identifier, in the limited circumstance where a member firm demonstrates its best efforts to obtain a CUSIP identifier and provides documentation to identify the security.

Per Notice 21-33, FINRA adopted amendments to Rule 6432 (Compliance with the Information Requirements of SEA Rule 15c2-11) in light of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) amendments to SEC Rule 15c2-11 (SEC Rule 15c2-11). As amended, Rule 6432 will require a qualified inter-dealer quotation system (Qualified IDQS) to submit a modified Form 211 filing to FINRA in connection with each initial information review, and a daily security file to FINRA containing summary information for all securities quoted on its system on each day that it makes a publicly available determination permitted under SEC Rule 15c2-11, among other amendments. The amendments to Rule 6432 will take effect on September 28, 2021—in line with the compliance date for the amendments to SEC Rule 15c2-11.

The amended rule text is available in the online FINRA Manual.

Per Notice 21-34, FINRA has adopted new rules to address firms with a significant history of misconduct. New Rule 4111 (Restricted Firm Obligations) requires member firms that are identified as “Restricted Firms” to deposit cash or qualified securities in a segregated, restricted account; adhere to specified conditions or restrictions; or comply with a combination of such obligations. New Rule 9561 (Procedures for Regulating Activities Under Rule 4111) and amendments to Rule 9559 (Hearing Procedures for Expedited Proceedings Under the Rule 9550 Series) establish a new expedited proceeding to implement Rule 4111.

The new rules and rule amendments become effective on January 1, 2022.

The rule text is available in Attachment A. A flow chart of the Rule 4111 process is available in Attachment B.

Special Notices

There were no Special Notices in September.

SEC

Final Rules

Per Release No. 33-10984, The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) is adopting amendments to Volumes I and II of the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval system (“EDGAR”) Filer Manual (“Filer Manual”) and related rules and forms. The EDGAR system was upgraded on September 20, 2021.

Proposed Rules

Per Release No. 34-91603, The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) is proposing to amend Form N-PX under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“Investment Company Act”) to enhance the information mutual funds, exchange-traded funds (“ETFs”), and certain other funds currently report annually about their proxy votes and to make that information easier to analyze. The Commission also is proposing rule and form amendments under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) that would require an institutional investment manager subject to section 13(f) of the Exchange Act to report annually on Form N-PX how it voted proxies relating to executive compensation matters, as required by section 14A of the Exchange Act. The proposed reporting requirements for institutional investment managers, if adopted, would complete implementation of section 951 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank Act”).

Interim Final Rules

There were no interim final rules in September.

Interpretive Releases

There were no interpretive releases in September.

Policy Statements

There were no policy statements in September.

NFA

Notices to Members

Per Notice I-21-28:

Recognizing that Members may permanently adopt hybrid work environments and permit APs to work remotely, NFA recently amended its definition of branch office. The amended definition excludes any remote working location or flexible shared workspace where one or more APs from the same household live or rent/lease, provided:

The AP(s) does not hold the location out publicly as the Member's office;
The AP(s) does not meet with customers or physically handle customer funds at the location; and
Any CFTC or NFA-required records created at the remote location are accessible at the firm's main or applicable branch office(s) as required under CFTC and NFA requirements.

Members may delist locations currently identified as branch offices if they fall outside of the amended definition.

These amendments will become effective on September 23, 2021, at which time the relief provided in Notice to Members I-20-12 will expire.

Per Notice I-21-29:

NFA has amended Financial Requirements Section 18 to specify that Swap Dealers (SD) Members subject to the filing requirements under CFTC Regulation 23.105(k) will satisfy NFA's requirement by filing the information specified by NFA in the form and manner provided by NFA. This amendment will become effective October 6, 2021.

NFA adopted the proposed amendments for two reasons. First, NFA has developed standardized tables available in WinJammer™ to collect the specific information from SD Members. The tables will facilitate NFA's collection and analysis of the information and will also provide SD Members with certainty on the format for filing the information. Second, NFA has identified certain information required by CFTC Regulation 23.105(k) that is similar in nature to information that NFA will collect under CFTC Regulation 23.105(l). NFA's standardized tables will not collect this similar information.

The information that will be required by the standardized tables includes:

Product category and the amount of the deduction for market risk on each product for which the SD calculates a deduction for market risk other than in accordance with a model;
Daily intra-month VaR;
Product category and the deduction for market risk on each product for which the SD uses scenario analysis;
10 largest commitments listed by counterparty;
Number of business days for which the actual daily net trading loss exceeded the corresponding daily VaR; and
Backtesting results of all internal models used to compute allowable capital, including VaR, and credit risk models, indicating the number of backtesting exceptions.

Per Notice I-21-30:

NFA has amended Financial Requirements Section 10 to impose a $1,000 per business day late fee on each financial report or other filing required by Financial Requirements Section 17 submitted after its due date. This late fee is consistent with the late fee NFA imposes on futures commission merchant, introducing broker and forex dealer Members that submit late financial filings.

NFA also adopted a new Interpretive Notice to Financial Requirements Section 17 entitled Financial Requirements Section 17: Initial Margin Model Ongoing Monitoring Reports clarifying NFA's expectations regarding quarterly and annual initial margin (IM) model performance reporting. The Interpretive Notice specifies the information currently required to be submitted and clarifies due dates for these filings.

The amendment to Financial Requirements Section 10 and the new Interpretive Notice will become effective on October 6, 2021.

Per Notice I-21-31:

NFA utilizes an electronic voting process for contested Directors' elections, contested Nominating Committee member elections and Articles' amendments approval votes. If elections are necessary, NFA has engaged a third-party election service provider to administer the electronic voting process. To facilitate the electronic voting process, each Member shall designate an Executive Representative who will have the Member's sole authority to sign nominations made by petition, receive notices of Member meetings and proxy materials, complete proxy cards and provide voting instructions and cast votes on behalf of the Member. Members may designate an Executive Representative through NFA's website. Only firm personnel who are the Security Manager or are authorized to view, update and file information in ORS may complete the Executive Representative Contact form.

If a Member fails to complete this form and designate an Executive Representative, the Member's membership contact listed in ORS will be deemed to be the Executive Representative. If a Member has already designated an Executive Representative, it is not necessary to do so again unless the person designated as the Executive Representative has changed.

Board and Nominating Committee Members' Terms to Expire at 2022 Board of Directors' Regular Annual Meeting

The Nominating Committee relies heavily on the recommendations of the membership in making its nominating decisions. Please give this matter serious consideration and return your submission(s) to NFA by mail, email or fax for receipt no later than October 13, 2021.

Per Notice I-21-32:

NFA has amended Compliance Rule 2-49 to provide that any swap dealer (SD) Member that violates CFTC Regulation 37.12 or the Part 50 Regulations will be deemed to have also violated an NFA requirement. This amendment will become effective on September 30, 2021.

News Releases

September 16, 2021

NFA orders London, U.K. swap dealer ED&F Man Capital Markets Limited to pay a $150,000 fine

September 16, Chicago—NFA has ordered London, U.K. swap dealer ED&F Man Capital Markets Limited (ED&F Man) to pay a $150,000 fine.

The Decision, issued by NFA's Business Conduct Committee (BCC), is based on a Complaint issued by the BCC and a settlement offer submitted by ED&F Man, in which it neither admitted nor denied the allegations. The Committee found that ED&F Man failed to comply with the qualification testing requirement as to certain associated persons by the compliance date.

The complete text of the Complaint and Decision can be viewed on NFA's website.

Hot Issues

CyberCrime

Regulatory Exam Preparedness

Our Perspective

For more information, please contact:

Mitch Avnet

p. (646) 346-2468

mavnet@compliance-risk.com

David Amster

p. (917) 568-6470

damster@compliance-risk.com

Sources:

FINRA September 2021 Industry Notices
SEC Regulatory Actions
NFA Notices
NFA Press Releases

The post Monthly Regulatory Summary (September 2021) appeared first on Compliance Risk Concepts.

News Update: FINRA to Sweep BDs on Use of Social Media Influencers to Refer Clients

CRC — Tue, 28 Sep 2021 14:36:22 +0000

September 2021

Overview & Summary

FINRA announced that it is conducting a review of firm practices related to the acquisition of customers through social media channels and how firms manage their obligations related to information collected from those customers and other individuals that may provide data to firms. Sweep effort review periods will begin (unless otherwise noted) starting January 1, 2020 and will likely carry through the date of examination (or most recent quarter end). Note that this sweep effort was announced following a request for comment by the SEC regarding “digital engagement practices” of advisers and broker dealers. View this request in full, here.

Our Take

As always, CRC reminds firms that the best compliance program is a proactive one. As such, we suggest that firms (whether registered with FINRA as a BD or with the SEC as an RIA) who are utilizing social media, as well as social media influencers, often known as finfluencers, review their current policies and procedures to ensure that recordkeeping, data tracking and protection, and disclosure requirements relative to investments, investment advice, and solicitation agreements are all addressed properly. In addition, CRC recommends that key personnel involved in such processes are well trained, and that such training is specific and documented.

Some Key Takeaways:

FINRA is instituting this initial sweep effort, but investment advisory firms should prepare themselves as well for a similar initiative from the SEC.
FINRA appears to be focused on determining whether firms have adequate written policies and procedures in place to ensure that obligations are met where finfluencers and social media are used to refer clients, as well as whether procedures are followed.
The SEC’s request for comment also notes “gamification” as an area of interest with respect to the collection of and engagement with client and prospect data.
The full FINRA sweep exam scope is available here.

Opportunities for CRC to Assist Your Firm (list not exhaustive):

CRC can proactively conduct a review of your current compliance program and digital engagement activities to identify opportunities to potentially implement enhancements in preparation for sweep examinations.
CRC is available to assist with sweep exam responses.
CRC is available for outsourced support with respect to social media marketing in general, as well as where the use of finfluencers is applicable.
CRC can produce written social media marketing/ influencer referral policies and procedures designed to comply with relevant regulatory implications.
CRC can provide best practices to firms looking to expand into this area or to ensure current program compliance.
CRC can perform a program analysis to ensure compliance with Reg SP relative to social media referral programs.

Please contact Mitch Avnet for more information.

Mitch Avnet at mavnet@compliance-risk.com or (646) 346-2468

The post News Update: FINRA to Sweep BDs on Use of Social Media Influencers to Refer Clients appeared first on Compliance Risk Concepts.

Regulation Best Interest

CRC — Mon, 15 Jul 2019 16:18:35 +0000

On June 5, 2019 the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) voted to enhance the regulatory framework standard of conduct for broker-dealers (or “firms”) and provide an interpretation of the fiduciary duty for investment advisers by issuing Regulation Best Interest (“Reg BI”). The SEC is giving firms a transition period until June 30, 2020.

Reg BI framework is more expansive than the vacated Department of Labor (“DOL”) fiduciary rule as it covers all securities investment recommendations to retail customers rather than just those for retirement accounts. By setting out specific obligations of broker-dealers and investment advisers, the SEC is seeking to tailor requirements to the different types of products and services each provide in order to preserve customer choice in the industry. Reg BI sets out new rules which will increase compliance efforts for firms but provides a more uniform standard and does not include many of the onerous aspects of the DOL rule such as a private right of action.

The framework includes:

A “best interest” standard comprising four obligations for broker-dealers when providing recommendations to retail customers (Regulation Best Interest or Reg BI);
A required client relationship summary disclosure (Form CRS) for both broker-dealers and investment advisers;
An interpretation of the federal fiduciary standard for investment advisers that would reaffirm their fiduciary obligations; and
An interpretation clarifying that broker-dealers that provide advisory services are not considered to be investment advisors when such services are “solely incidental” to the conduct of their business.
Reg BI and Form CRS have a compliance date of June 30, 2020 while the interpretations will become effective upon publication in the Federal Register.

Reg BI consist of four obligations for broker-dealers when providing recommendations to retail customers. Reg BI does not expressly define “best interest,” instead stating that broker-dealers must act “without placing the financial or other interest of the broker ahead of the interest of the retail customer.” However, the SEC makes clear that the term does not create a fiduciary obligation and explains that it will determine whether a broker-dealer has acted in their customers’ best interest based on the four obligations: (1) disclosure, (2) care, (3) conflict of interest and (4) compliance.

Disclosure – Reg BI imposes an obligation on to provide a 2-page relationship summary (Form CRS) to clients in a question and answer format. Disclosures must contain a summary of fees, costs, conflicts, and standards of conduct along with alink to the SEC’s Investor.gov site.

The timing of the disclosure varies as following:

Broker-dealer: before or at the earliest of: (i) a recommendation of an account type, a securities transaction, or an investment strategy involving securities, (ii) placing an order for the retail investor, or (iii) the opening of a brokerage account for the retail investor
Investment adviser: before or at the time of entering into an advisory contract
Dual registrant: at earlier of investment adviser or broker-dealer delivery requirement

In addition, firms must provide additional disclosures when they:

Open a new account that is different from the retail investor’s existing account(s)
Recommend that the retail investor roll over assets from a retirement account into a new or existing account or investment
Recommend or provide a new brokerage or investment advisory service or investment that does not necessarily involve the opening of a new account and would not be held in an existing account (e.g., securities sold through a “check and application” process)

So what does this mean: CRC recommends firms review their current customer agreements and disclosures to determine what changes will need to be made and involve technology teams to consider potential digital solutions. CRC also recommends a cross-functional team of business, compliance and operational employees work together to confirm disclosure of all material facts pertinent to a conflict of interest associated with the recommendation that are “full and fair”.

Care – Firms will have an obligation to provide reasonable “diligence, care, and skill” to satisfy three obligations: reasonable-basis, customer-specific and quantitative. Additionally, firms must evaluate reasonably available alternatives, however broker-dealers will not have to evidence review of all alternatives. Similar to the DOL fiduciary rule, Reg BI's care obligation covers recommendations concerning rollovers and account choice (e.g., brokerage or advisory), as well as those to take a retirement plan distribution for purposes of opening a securities trading account.

So what does this mean: We recommend firms dust off work done during their DoL fiduciary rule prep. Because the rule is not prescriptive, there is no “one size fits all” model for compliance. The compliance obligation requires firms to maintain policies and procedures to ensure compliance with Reg BI. Notably, this obligation provides an opportunity for the SEC and FINRA to bring enforcement actions for compliance failures without the existence of underlying violations of Reg BI. Therefore, firms should carefully develop Reg BI policies and procedures with a view towards how they will demonstrate that they have met the best interest standard - including documenting all written and oral disclosures to clients.

Conflict – Reg BI does not explicitly define material conflicts of interest. In contrast to the DOL rule, Reg BI allows firms to sell proprietary products, including initial public offerings, and continue to receive payments from third parties for shelf space – as long as they disclose conflicts of interest. For example, in instances where a registered representative holds a limited license (e.g., only to sell mutual funds), but the firm offers a full suite of products, the representative may need to disclose this to their customers. However, the final rule makes clear that there are certain conflicts of interest that cannot be cured through disclosure, specifically prohibiting certain types of sales contests and quotas within defined parameters (e.g., for specific security types in short time periods).

So what does this mean: CRC recommends firms review their range of products and services they offer along with their payout grid in order to identify potential conflicts and determine whether they will need to be mitigated, eliminated or disclosed^[1]. The final rule also instructs firms to develop a penalty system for any representatives that do not adequately manage or disclose their conflicts of interest. Firms will need to establish, maintain, and enforce written policies and procedures reasonably designed to:

Identify and at a minimum disclose (in accordance with the Disclosure Obligation) or eliminate all conflicts of interest associated with the recommendation
Identify and mitigate conflicts of interest that create an incentive for a broker-dealer’s financial professionals to place either their interests or the broker-dealer’s interest ahead of the retail customer’s interest
Identify and disclose any material limitations on offerings (e.g., proprietary or other limited range of products) and any conflicts associated with the limitations, and prevent the limitations and associated conflicts from causing the broker-dealer or its financial professionals to place their interests ahead of the retail customer’s interests
Eliminate sales contests, sales quotas, bonuses, and non-cash compensation based on the sale of specific securities or specific types of securities within a limited period of time

Compliance – Reg BI requires firms to develop policies and procedures in order to demonstrate that they have met the best interest standard - including documenting all written and oral disclosures to clients. The SEC has made changes to Rules 17a-3 and 17a-4, which require broker-dealers to maintain records of all information collected and provided to retail customers pursuant to Reg BI for six years, including the identity of each natural person who is an associated person of the broker-dealer responsible for the customer accounts. Firms that fail to maintain adequate policies and procedures may face enforcement actions from the SEC and FINRA for compliance failures.

So what does this mean: CRC advises firms to review and enhance their policies and procedures that address: Product and Pricing; Operations; Technology; and Communications. Additionally, firms should put in place processes to capture and retain disclosures, provide training on the new requirements and ensure that there is a supervisory structure to oversee compliance.

Investment Advisers – While investment advisers have an existing fiduciary obligation, the SEC’s investment adviser interpretation of Reg BI makes these obligations explicit:

Provide advice in the best interest of the client
A duty of loyalty
Best execution for client transactions
Disclosure of conflicts of interest

Because the final rule did not include enhancements contained in the proposal, investment advisor are not likely to require significant analysis or operational changes as those for broker-dealers, e.g. - licensing and continuing education requirements, provision of account statements to clients and similar financial responsibility requirements.

Determining whether broker-dealers’ advice provided to retail clients is “solely incidental” will be determined by 2 criteria:

Level of investment discretion
Unlimited investment discretion is not solely incidental advice and the broker-dealer would be subject to the Act
If investment discretion is limited in time, scope, or some other way the advice provided may be deemed solely incidental
Account monitoring
Continuous, previously agreed-upon account monitoring would likely not be considered solely incidental
Periodic account monitoring or voluntary account monitoring would likely be considered solely incidental

So what does this mean: Investment advisers should be aware that the SEC is continuing to evaluate these enhancements and may add them in the future. The SEC also clarified the solely incidental exception under the Advisers Act: broker-dealers do not have a fiduciary duty to a retail investor unless that broker-dealer is exercising unlimited investment discretion with respect to the account, or the broker-dealer has agreed to continuous monitoring of the account

To qualify for an exemption from the Advisers Act (“the Act”), broker-dealers must satisfy 2 conditions:

Receive no special compensation (i.e., only commissions and not asset-based fees)
Provide only “solely incidental” advice

DoL and States – After the DOL rule was vacated, a number of states began to introduce their own fiduciary or best interest standards. These rules vary across states – some states like Nevada, are contemplating a private right of action and a largely ongoing obligation. Others states like New York would only apply a best interest standard to the sale of life insurance annuities. These differences will make it challenging operationally for firms to adhere to each state’s specific requirements. The SEC declined to provide any opinion on whether its rules would preempt state standards and left the question to “future judicial proceedings.”

So what does this mean: The industry can likely expect litigation on this issue as states continue to move forward with their rulemakings and attempt to retain control over standards in their jurisdictions. Meanwhile, the DOL has stated that it will issue an updated version of its fiduciary rule later this year. While there have not been any explicit assurances, it is likely that the concepts and requirements from the DOL will align with Reg BI.

Not applicable – Equally as important, Reg BI will not:

Extend beyond a particular recommendation or generally require a broker-dealer to have a continuous duty to a retail customer or impose a duty to monitor^[2];
Require the broker-dealer to refuse to accept a customer’s order that is contrary to the broker-dealer’s recommendation; or
Apply to self-directed or otherwise unsolicited transactions by a retail customer, whether or not the customer also receives separate recommendations from the broker-dealer.

^[1] Firms can use the FINRA Report on Conflicts of Interest as guidance in managing, mitigating and eliminating conflicts of interest in their businesses.

^[2] It is the SEC’s position that when a broker-dealer agrees with a retail customer to provide account monitoring services: (1) the broker-dealer would be required to disclose the material facts, scope and frequency of those services pursuant to the Disclosure Obligation, and (2) such agreed-upon account monitoring services involve an implicit recommendation to hold (i.e., an implicit recommendation not to buy, sell, or exchange assets pursuant to that securities account review) at the time agreed-upon monitoring occurs, which is a recommendation “of any securities transaction or investment strategy involving securities” covered by Reg BI.

The post Regulation Best Interest appeared first on Compliance Risk Concepts.

A Note from Mitch Avnet

Mitch Avnet — Sat, 08 Jun 2013 19:51:14 +0000

One of the primary drivers for Compliance Risk Concepts (CRC) is to raise the awareness level and thought process related to real world compliance and risk issues in a “down to earth,” realistic and relatable way. Our goal is to help our clients, prospects and readers decipher the challenges faced by compliance and risk professionals across every industry vertical by providing “plain English” perspectives and views. While you may not view our approach as “conventional” – it’s ok – that’s not what we aim to be nor what we are all about. We seek to differentiate ourselves through the delivery of an innovative service / solution model, predicated on practical guidance coupled with achievable outcomes. Although it is early in our evolution, we are seeing strong signs that our vision and strategy are resonating with our clients and service partners. As we continue to grow and evolve as a company, I wanted to personally thank all of you for the continued support, enthusiasm and confidence demonstrated toward CRC and the brand we are building within the industry. As always, we'd love to hear how YOU think we are doing. Feel free to suggest topics or issues you would like to see discussed in future blogs. Click here to contact me now. Many thanks, Mitch Avnet Managing Partner Compliance Risk Concepts photo: Mark Tassoni

The post A Note from Mitch Avnet appeared first on Compliance Risk Concepts.

Thomson Reuters partnership

Mitch Avnet — Thu, 09 May 2013 19:55:49 +0000

CRC partners with Thomson Reuters, the world's leading source of intelligent information. This is one of CRC's many successful, strategic partnerships. To learn more, visit our Partners page.

The post Thomson Reuters partnership appeared first on Compliance Risk Concepts.

CRC Archives - Compliance Risk Concepts

10-Year Anniversary Letter From Mitch Avnet

Compliance Risk Concepts Receives Strategic Investment from MidOcean Partners

Regulatory News Update: Proposed Amendment to FINRA 3240 (Borrowing From or Lending to Customers)

Regulatory News Update: SEC Adopts New Rule Enhancing Short Sale Disclosure

SEC Adopts Amendments to Names Rule

Principal Elements

Expands Scope

Temporary Departures from the 80% Investment Requirement

Derivatives

Unlisted Registered Closed-End Funds and BDCs

Enhanced Prospectus Disclosure

Plain English Requirements for Terms Used in Fund Names

Form N-PORT Reporting Requirements

Recordkeeping

Compliance Date

Tiered Compliance Period

Compliance Cost Estimates

Regulatory News Update: SEC Sweep Initiative Targeting AI-Driven Investment Advisers

Regulatory News Update: SIPC Nearing Launch of Broker-Dealer Portal

Celebrating a Decade of Success and Growth: Compliance Risk Concepts Turns 10

Monthly Regulatory Summary (September 2023)

FINRA

SEC

NFA

Hot Issue

Our Perspective

Regulatory News Update: Citadel Prepared to Take Legal Action Against SEC Amid WhatsApp Probe

News Update: SEC Provides Road Map for Investment Advisory Firm Examinations

Monthly Regulatory Summary (August 2023)

FINRA

SEC

NFA

Hot Issue

Our Perspective

Monthly Regulatory Summary (July 2023)

FINRA

SEC

NFA

Hot Issue

Our Perspective

Monthly Regulatory Summary (June 2023)

Monthly Regulatory Summary (May 2023)

Monthly Regulatory Summary (April 2023)

Monthly Regulatory Summary (January 2023)

Considerations for FINRA Membership involving Digital Asset Securities

Monthly Regulatory Summary (December 2022)

Monthly Regulatory Summary (September 2022)

Monthly Regulatory Summary (August 2022)￼

Monthly Regulatory Summary (February 2022)

SEC Offers Guidance on Form CRS

News Reminder: SEC Approves FINRA Rules Change

Monthly Regulatory Summary (December 2021)

Monthly Regulatory Summary (September 2021)

News Update: FINRA to Sweep BDs on Use of Social Media Influencers to Refer Clients

Regulation Best Interest

A Note from Mitch Avnet

Thomson Reuters partnership

Monthly Regulatory Summary (August 2022)